ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Efficacy of propranolol and pingyangmycin, respectively, combined with pulsed dye laser on children with hemangioma.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination Therapy With AOPT Intense Pulsed Light (Dual-Band Vascular Filter) and 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser for Solitary, Superficial Infantile Hemangioma: A Retrospective Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- The paradoxical roles of miR-4295 in human cancer: Implications in pathogenesis and personalized medicine.Genes & diseases · 2022Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Hemangioma Resection for Encephalofacial Angiomatosis (Sturge-Weber Syndrome) in Children under Intelligent Algorithm.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Dye Laser Combined with Pingyangmycin on Hyperplastic Scar after Acne.Mediators of inflammation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical efficacy of propranolol and pingyangmycin, respectively, combined with pulsed dye laser in the treatment of children with hemangioma was analyzed, to provide a new therapeutic idea for their clinical treatment. A total of 120 children with hemangioma were selected into the study. Children treated with propranolol combined with pulsed dye laser were in group A, those treated with pingyangmycin combined with pulsed dye laser were in group B, and 60 healthy children were selected as control group (group C). Blood samples of children were taken before and after treatment for miR-4295 detection. The expression of miR-4295 was observed after treatment, and the total clinical remission rate and adverse reactions after treatment were compared between the two groups. The tumor volume of the two groups was significantly reduced after treatment, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05); miR-4295 expression was reduced in the two groups (P<0.05); adverse reactions in propranolol group were less than pingyangmycin group during treatment (P<0.05). Propranolol and pingyangmycin, respectively, combined with pulsed dye laser had ideal efficacy on hemangioma in children. Moreover, miR-4295 was highly expressed in children with hemangioma, and the expression level reduced after two methods of treatment. However, adverse reactions in propranolol group were less and its safety was higher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.