ReviewFrontiers in psychology2019
The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory-cued terminal knee extension enhances vastus medialis motor unit function in the early phase following ACL reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Combining Multisensory Cueing and Velocity-Based Training to Enhance Shot Put Performance in an F12 Para-Athlete: A Case Report.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Footstep sounds influence bistable biological motion perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Impact of Neural network-quantified musical groove on cyclists' joint coordination and muscle synergy: a repeated measures study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- It Is Movement All the Way Down: Broken Rhythms and Embodied Selfhood in Depersonalization.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Increased risk of falls in older adults with hearing loss and slow gait: results from the Otassha Study.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Binaural Pulse Modulation (BPM) as an Adjunctive Treatment for Anxiety: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring multisensory integration of non-naturalistic sounds on body perception in young females with eating disorders symptomatology: a study protocol.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Body weight distortions in an auditory-driven body illusion in subclinical and clinical eating disorders.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- From a Technology That Replaces Human Perception-Action to One That Expands It: Some Critiques of Current Technology Use in Sport.Sports medicine - open · 2021Article
- Action Sounds Informing Own Body Perception Influence Gender Identity and Social Cognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- A Perspective on Implementing Movement Sonification to Influence Movement (and Eventually Cognitive) Creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sounds that result from our movement and that mark the outcome of our actions typically convey useful information concerning the state of our body and its movement, as well as providing pertinent information about the stimuli with which we are interacting. Here we review the rapidly growing literature investigating the influence of non-veridical auditory cues (i.e., inaccurate in terms of their context, timing, and/or spectral distribution) on multisensory body and action perception, and on motor behavior. Inaccurate auditory cues provide a unique opportunity to study cross-modal processes: the ability to detect the impact of each sense when they provide a slightly different message is greater. Additionally, given that similar cross-modal processes likely occur regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory input, studying incongruent interactions are likely to also help us predict interactions between congruent inputs. The available research convincingly demonstrates that perceptions of the body, of movement, and of surface contact features (e.g., roughness) are influenced by the addition of non-veridical auditory cues. Moreover, auditory cues impact both motor behavior and emotional valence, the latter showing that sounds that are highly incongruent with the performed movement induce feelings of unpleasantness (perhaps associated with lower processing fluency). Such findings are relevant to the design of auditory cues associated with product interaction, and the use of auditory cues in sport performance and therapeutic situations given the impact on motor behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.