Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32010006›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Free-Ranging Dogs Are Capable of Utilizing Complex Human Pointing Cues.

Debottam Bhattacharjee, Sarab Mandal, Piuli Shit, Mebin George Varghese, Aayushi Vishnoi, Anindita Bhadra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debottam BhattacharjeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Sarab MandalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Piuli ShitDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Mebin George VargheseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Aayushi VishnoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Anindita BhadraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kolkata, India.
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs are one of the most common species to be found as pets and have been subjects of human curiosity, leading to extensive research on their socialization with humans. One of the dominant themes in dog cognition pertains to their capacity for understanding and responding to human referential gestures. The remarkable sociocognitive skills of pet dogs, while interacting with humans, is quite well established. However, studies regarding the free-ranging subpopulations are greatly lacking. The interactions of these dogs with humans are quite complex and multidimensional. For the first time, we tested 160 adult free-ranging dogs to understand their ability to follow relatively complex human referential gestures using dynamic and momentary distal pointing cues. We found that these dogs are capable of following distal pointing cues from humans to locate hidden food rewards. However, approximately half of the population tested showed a lack of tendency to participate even after successful familiarization with the experimental setup. A closer inspection revealed that anxious behavioral states of the individuals were responsible for such an outcome. Finally, we compared the results using data from an earlier study with dynamic proximal cues. We found that free-ranging dogs follow distal cues more accurately compared to proximal cue. We assume that life experiences with humans probably shape personalities of free-ranging dogs, which in turn influence their responsiveness to human communicative gestures.

Indexed as

distal cuesinterspecific communicationpoint followingreferential gesturessocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID32010006
PMCPMC6978287
OpenAlexW2999223877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.