Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

How Our Perception and Confidence Are Altered Using Decision Cues.

Tiasha Saha Roy, Bapun Giri, Arpita Saha Chowdhury, Satyaki Mazumder, Koel Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiasha Saha RoyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, India.
Bapun GiriDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Arpita Saha ChowdhuryDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, India.
Satyaki MazumderDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, India.
Koel DasDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how individuals utilize social information while making perceptual decisions and how it affects their decision confidence is crucial in a society. To date, very little has been known about perceptual decision-making in humans and the associated neural mediators under social influence. The present study provides empirical evidence of how individuals are manipulated by others' decisions while performing a face/car identification task. Subjects were significantly influenced by what they perceived as the decisions of other subjects, while the cues, in reality, were manipulated independently from the stimulus. Subjects, in general, tend to increase their decision confidence when their individual decision and the cues coincide, while their confidence decreases when cues conflict with their individual judgments, often leading to reversal of decision. Using a novel statistical model, it was possible to rank subjects based on their propensity to be influenced by cues. This was subsequently corroborated by an analysis of their neural data. Neural time series analysis revealed no significant difference in decision-making using social cues in the early stages, unlike neural expectation studies with predictive cues. Multivariate pattern analysis of neural data alludes to a potential role of the frontal cortex in the later stages of visual processing, which appeared to code the effect of cues on perceptual decision-making. Specifically, the medial frontal cortex seems to play a role in facilitating perceptual decision preceded by conflicting cues.

Indexed as

computational modelinggamma mixture modelmultivariate pattern classificationperceptual decision makingsocial influence

Identifiers

PMID32009875
PMCPMC6971401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.