ArticleCancer management and research2019
Clinical Outcomes And Cost-Effectiveness Of Different Staplers For Lung Lobectomy With Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing surgical outcomes of powered versus manual surgical staplers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare intra-operative adverse events (AE), post-operative outcomes, and costs of three different types of Echelon staplers (manual activated SC45A and electrical power-activated PSE45A & PSEE60A) used during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe carried out a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing VATS lobectomies using one of three staplers (SC45A, PSE45A, or PSEE60A) during a 2-year period at our institution. We compared intra-operative AEs, post-operative outcomes (drainage volume, chest tube duration, prolonged air leaks [PALs]), endoscopic product costs [ECs], and hospitalization costs [HCs]) amongst the three stapler groups.
resultsIn all 204 peripheral lung cancer patients were included in the study (95 in the SC45A group, 72 in the PSE45A group, and 37 in the PSEE60A group). We observed intra-operative AEs in 6 patients of the SC45A group, in 4 of the PSE45A group, and in 1 of the PSEE60A group (P>0.05). Drainage volumes among the three groups were similar. The mean chest tube duration was shorter]st in the PSE45A group followed by those in the PSEE60A and SC45A groups (P<0.05). PALs were lowest in the PSE45A group and highest in the SC45A group (P<0.05). The mean EC in the PSEE60A group was significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P<0.05). We found no statistically significant differences in terms of HCs among groups.
conclusionThe three endoscopic staplers had similar incidences of intra-operative AEs when used for lobectomy with VATS. Use of the PSE45A stapler was associated with the shortest chest tube duration and least PALs, while use of the PSEE60A resulted in the highest EC rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.