Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009724›Full record

ArticlePlant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen2017

Genome-wide repeat dynamics reflect phylogenetic distance in closely related allotetraploid

Steven Dodsworth, Tae-Soo Jang, Monika Struebig, Mark W Chase, Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss, Andrew R Leitch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The nature and organization of satellite DNAs inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The hybrid lethality of interspecific FMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
  17. PhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
  18. PhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Steven Dodsworth *1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6531-3540
Tae-Soo Jang *3Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Monika Struebig1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK.
Mark W Chase2Department of Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS UK.
Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss3Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Andrew R Leitch1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Vienna · ATThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ChromovirusesGraph-based clusteringHigh-throughput sequencingPhylogeneticsRepetitive DNATy-3 Gypsy

Identifiers

PMID32009724
PMCPMC6961477
OpenAlexW2548525214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.