Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009696›Full record

ArticleBiogeochemistry2017

Comparing benthic biogeochemistry at a sandy and a muddy site in the Celtic Sea using a model and observations.

J N Aldridge, G Lessin, L O Amoudry, N Hicks, T Hull, J K Klar, V Kitidis, C L McNeill, J Ingels, E R Parker and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biogeochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

J N Aldridge1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-5102
G LessinPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH UK.
L O Amoudry5National Oceanography Centre, Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L3 5DA UK.
N Hicks3Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, PA37 1QA UK.
T Hull1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
J K Klar4Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO14 3ZH UK.
V KitidisPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH UK.
C L McNeillPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH UK.
J Ingels6Coastal and Marine Laboratory, Florida State University, 3618 Coastal Highway 98, St Teresa, 32358 FL USA.
E R Parker1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
B Silburn1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
T Silva1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
D B Sivyer1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
H E K Smith4Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO14 3ZH UK.
S WiddicombePlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH UK.
E M S WoodwardPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH UK.
J van der Molen1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
L Garcia1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.
S Kröger1Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from a 1D setup of the European Regional Seas Ecosystem Model (ERSEM) biogeochemical model were compared with new observations collected under the UK Shelf Seas Biogeochemistry (SSB) programme to assess model performance and clarify elements of shelf-sea benthic biogeochemistry and carbon cycling. Observations from two contrasting sites (muddy and sandy) in the Celtic Sea in otherwise comparable hydrographic conditions were considered, with the focus on the benthic system. A standard model parameterisation with site-specific light and nutrient adjustments was used, along with modifications to the within-seabed diffusivity to accommodate the modelling of permeable (sandy) sediments. Differences between modelled and observed quantities of organic carbon in the bed were interpreted to suggest that a large part (>90%) of the observed benthic organic carbon is biologically relatively inactive. Evidence on the rate at which this inactive fraction is produced will constitute important information to quantify offshore carbon sequestration. Total oxygen uptake and oxic layer depths were within the range of the measured values. Modelled depth average pore water concentrations of ammonium, phosphate and silicate were typically 5-20% of observed values at the muddy site due to an underestimate of concentrations associated with the deeper sediment layers. Model agreement for these nutrients was better at the sandy site, which had lower pore water concentrations, especially deeper in the sediment. Comparison of pore water nitrate with observations had added uncertainty, as the results from process studies at the sites indicated the dominance of the anammox pathway for nitrogen removal; a pathway that is not included in the model. Macrofaunal biomasses were overestimated, although a model run with increased macrofaunal background mortality rates decreased macrofaunal biomass and improved agreement with observations. The decrease in macrofaunal biomass was compensated by an increase in meiofaunal biomass such that total oxygen demand remained within the observed range. The permeable sediment modification reproduced some of the observed behaviour of oxygen penetration depth at the sandy site. It is suggested that future development in ERSEM benthic modelling should focus on: (1) mixing and degradation rates of benthic organic matter, (2) validation of benthic faunal biomass against large scale spatial datasets, (3) incorporation of anammox in the benthic nitrogen cycle, and (4) further developments to represent permeable sediment processes.

Indexed as

BenthicBiogeochemistryCeltic SeaModellingPermeable sediments

Identifiers

PMID32009696
PMCPMC6961523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.