Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009516›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2020

Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review.

Danni Collingridge Moore, Sheila Payne, Lieve Van den Block, Julie Ling, Katherine Froggatt, PACE

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danni Collingridge MooreInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5861-8706
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lieve Van den BlockVUB-UGhent End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Julie LingEuropean Association for Palliative Care, Vilvoorde, Belgium.
Katherine FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
PACE
Lancaster University · GBEuropean Association for Palliative Care · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of older people dying in long-term care facilities is increasing; however, care at the end of life can be suboptimal. Interventions to improve palliative care delivery within these settings have been shown to be effective in improving care, but little is known about their implementation.

aimThe aim of this study was to describe the nature of implementation strategies and to identify facilitators and/or barriers to implementing palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities.

designScoping review with a thematic synthesis, following the ENTREQ guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Published literature was identified from electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Controlled, non-controlled and qualitative studies and evaluations of interventions to improve palliative care in long-term care facilities were included. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were sourced and data extracted on the study characteristics, the implementation of the intervention, and facilitators and/or barriers to implementation.

resultsThe review identified 8902 abstracts, from which 61 studies were included in the review. A matrix of implementation was developed with four implementation strategies (facilitation, education/training, internal engagement and external engagement) and three implementation stages (conditions to introduce the intervention, embedding the intervention within day-to-day practice and sustaining ongoing change).

conclusionIncorporating an implementation strategy into the development and delivery of an intervention is integral in embedding change in practice. The review has shown that the four implementation strategies identified varied considerably across interventions; however, similar facilitators and barriers were encountered across the studies identified. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which different implementation strategies can facilitate the uptake of palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities.

Indexed as

Education, NursingHealth Plan ImplementationPalliative CareDelivery of Health CareHumansLong-Term CareQualitative Researchcare homesend-of-life careimplementationinterventionliterature reviewLong-term care facilitiesnursing homespalliative carepalliative medicinescoping review

Identifiers

PMID32009516
PMCPMC7222696
OpenAlexW3003483296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.