Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009438›Full record

ArticleThe bone & joint journal2020

Rogue stem cell clinics.

Iain R Murray, Jorge Chahla, Rachel M Frank, Nicolas S Piuzzi, Bert R Mandelbaum, Jason L Dragoo, Members of the Biologics Association

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The bone & joint journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations Related to Regenerative Medicine.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Stem Cell Therapy, the Market, the Opportunities and the Threat.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regulatory and Ethical Aspects of Orthobiologic Therapies.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biologic Association Annual Summit: 2020 Report.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iain R MurrayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jorge ChahlaRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rachel M FrankUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Nicolas S PiuzziCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bert R MandelbaumCedars Sinai Kerlan Jobe Institute, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Jason L DragooUniversity of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Members of the Biologics Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapies hold significant promise for the treatment of injured or diseased musculoskeletal tissues. However, despite advances in research, there is growing concern about the increasing number of clinical centres around the world that are making unwarranted claims or are performing risky biological procedures. Such providers have been known to recommend, prescribe, or deliver so called 'stem cell' preparations without sufficient data to support their true content and efficacy. In this annotation, we outline the current environment of stem cell-based treatments and the strategies of marketing directly to consumers. We also outline the difficulties in the regulation of these clinics and make recommendations for best practice and the identification and reporting of illegitimate providers. Cite this article:

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesConsumer Product SafetyDirect-to-Consumer AdvertisingHumansMarketing of Health ServicesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPatient SafetyPractice Guidelines as TopicStem Cell TransplantationUnited KingdomUnited StatesBiologicsDirect to consumer marketingRegulationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID32009438
PMCPMC7002842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.