ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2020
ICSI in late matured oocytes, is it worth it? Study with laboratory, clinical and genetic evaluation results.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Live birth achieved despite the absence of ejaculated spermatozoa and mature oocytes retrieved: a case report.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare laboratory results of embryo development from late matured oocytes in relation to mature oocytes in D+0.
methodsWe carried out a cross-sectional study during the period from January to December 2018, in which we collected data through medical records analysis. 913 oocytes were collected and divided into 3 groups: group 1 - 643 MII oocytes; group 2 - 119 MI oocytes and; group 3 - 151 PI oocytes. These studied oocytes were from different maternal ages and infertility factors. The analyzed variables were fertilization rate, embryo cleavage, top quality embryos on the third day of development, blastocyst stage, top quality blastocysts, euploid blastocysts, top quality blastocysts and gestation. We documented the data, and performed the statistical analysis using the chi-square test (p<0.05).
resultsAll MII oocytes were injected (643); 103/119 MI oocytes and 88/151 PI oocytes that matured late in D + 1, were also injected. The fertilization rate of the three groups did not present statistical difference. The oocytes of group 1 had a statistically proven better prognosis than oocytes from groups 2 and 3 when compared, respectively, embryo cleavage (p=0.000), top quality embryos on the third day of development (p=0.000) and blastocyst formation rate (p=0.004). In the LMO group, there were no euploid embryos and, therefore, there no embryo transfer.
conclusionAlthough late matured oocytes have made blastocyst formation possible, even if in low rates, there were no viable embryos for transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.