ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021
How Can We Predict a Successful Outcome after Varicocelectomy in Painful Varicocele Patients? An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scrotal Pain after Varicocelectomy: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Letter to the Editor: How Can We Predict a Successful Outcome after Varicocelectomy in Painful Varicocele Patients? An Updated Meta-Analysis.The world journal of men's health · 2021Article
- Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy for testicular pain: a retrospective study on outcomes and predictors of pain relief.Basic and clinical andrology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the relationships of varicocele characteristics and surgical methods with the pain resolution rate post-varicocelectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase (1980 to December 2018). The keywords used for the search were "varicocele," "varicocelectomy OR ligation OR repair," and "pain OR painful." Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles. Studies were evaluated for eligibility, and those that fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were selected for full-text review.
resultsFourteen studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the postoperative pain resolution rate with respect to varicocele grades I, II, and III. The resolution rate was significantly higher for dull pain than for dragging and sharp pain (odds ratio [OR], 5.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-18.41; p=0.003 and OR, 8.72; 95% CI, 2.91-26.08; p=0.0001, respectively). In terms of the surgical approach, subinguinal ligation was significantly more effective in terms of pain resolution than high ligation (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.54-4.85; p=0.0006). Microsurgical varicocelectomy showed a significantly higher likelihood of pain resolution than laparoscopic varicocelectomy (OR, 7.12; 95% CI, 3.78-13.44; p<0.0001).
conclusionsPatients with varicocele complaining of dull pain preoperatively had a higher likelihood of postoperative pain resolution than those complaining of dragging or sharp pain. Furthermore, subinguinal ligation was more effective for pain resolution than high ligation, and microsurgical varicocelectomy showed better surgical outcomes than laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.