Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009312›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021

Comparison of Intralesional Hyaluronic Acid

Andrea Cocci, Fabrizio Di Maida, Gianmartin Cito, Pierangelo Verrienti, Nicola Laruccia, Riccardo Campi, Andrea Mari, Marina Di Mauro, Marco Falcone, Giovanni E Cacciamani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Intralesional collagenaseTranslational andrology and urology · 2022
    Article
  12. The Natural History of Peyronie's Disease.The world journal of men's health · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-6294
Fabrizio Di MaidaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-4808
Gianmartin CitoDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. gianmartin.cito@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-4025
Pierangelo VerrientiDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-5961
Nicola LarucciaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-4112
Riccardo CampiDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-0888
Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-5591
Marina Di MauroDepartment of Urology, Vittorio Emanuele II, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-6940
Marco FalconeDepartment of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-892X
Giovanni E CacciamaniDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8892-5539
Giulio GaraffaThe Institute of Urology, University College of London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-5098
Andrea MinerviniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-4628
Giorgio Ivan RussoDepartment of Urology, Vittorio Emanuele II, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1493-1087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional hyaluronic acid (HA) as compared with verapamil injection in patients with Peyronie's disease (PD). MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween January 2015 and December 2018, men in PD acute phase were prospectively recruited. This open-label, prospective study included 2 different protocols. Group A: 8-week cycle of weekly intraplaque injections with HA; Group B: 8-week cycle of weekly intraplaque injections with verapamil. Penile curvature, plaque size, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed at baseline and after 3 months.

resultsTwo-hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. Of these, 125 received intralesional HA (Group A), 119 received intralesional verapamil (Group B). At enrollment, median age was 56.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]=47.0-63.0 years), median curvature 35.0° (IQR=25.0°-45.0°), median IIEF-15 score 19.0 (IQR=16.0-23.0), median VAS 4.0 (IQR=4.0-5.0). Median difference for IIEF-15 was 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-1.94) in Group A and 0.0 (95% CI=-0.04-0.14) in Group B (p<0.05) and median difference for VAS score was -4.0 (95% CI=-4.11--3.65) in Group A and -1.0 (95% CI=-0.50-2.01) in Group B (p<0.05). Plaque size decreased by -1.50 mm (IQR=1.60-2.10 mm) in Group A and -1.20 in Group B (p=0.10), while penile curvature decreased by -9.50° (IQR=4.50°-13.00°) in group A and -4.50 (IQR=2.50-7.50) in Group B (p<0.01).

conclusionsIntralesional HA injections could represent a reliable treatment option for the conservative management of patients with acute phase of PD.

Indexed as

Hyaluronic acidPenile curvaturePenile indurationPeyronie diseaseVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID32009312
PMCPMC7994654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.