ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020
Application of Machine Learning Models to Evaluate Hypoglycemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Self-Care in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes-An Integrative Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Applying machine learning approaches for predicting obesity risk using US health administrative claims database.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2024Observational
- Digital Health and Machine Learning Technologies for Blood Glucose Monitoring and Management of Gestational Diabetes.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Machine learning based study for the classification of Type 2 diabetes mellitus subtypes.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for classification of next glucose measurement in hospitalized patients.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- "Big Data" Approaches for Prevention of the Metabolic Syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Deep transfer learning and data augmentation improve glucose levels prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Ability of Current Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict and Detect Hypoglycemia in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis.JMIR diabetes · 2021Article
- Use of Machine Learning Approaches in Clinical Epidemiological Research of Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo identify predictors of hypoglycemia and five other clinical and economic outcomes among treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using machine learning and structured data from a large, geographically diverse administrative claims database.
methodsA retrospective cohort study design was applied to Optum Clinformatics claims data indexed on first antidiabetic prescription date. A hypothesis-free, Bayesian machine learning analytics platform (GNS Healthcare REFS™: Reverse Engineering and Forward Simulation) was used to build ensembles of generalized linear models to predict six outcomes defined in patients' 1-year post-index claims history, including hypoglycemia, antidiabetic class persistence, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target attainment, HbA1c change, T2D-related inpatient admissions, and T2D-related medical costs. A unified set of 388 variables defined in patients' 1-year pre-index claims history constituted the set of predictors for all REFS models.
resultsThe derivation cohort comprised 453,487 patients with a T2D diagnosis between 2014 and 2017. Patients with comorbid conditions had the highest risk of hypoglycemia, including those with prior hypoglycemia (odds ratio [OR] = 25.61) and anemia (OR = 1.29). Other identified risk factors included insulin (OR = 2.84) and sulfonylurea use (OR = 1.80). Biguanide use (OR = 0.75), high blood glucose (> 125 mg/dL vs. < 100 mg/dL, OR = 0.47; 100-125 mg/dL vs. < 100 mg/dL, OR = 0.53), and missing blood glucose test (OR = 0.40) were associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Area under the curve (AUC) of the hypoglycemia model in held-out testing data was 0.77. Patients in the top 15% of predicted hypoglycemia risk constituted 50% of observed hypoglycemic events, 26% of T2D-related inpatient admissions, and 24% of all T2D-related medical costs.
conclusionsMachine learning models built within high-dimensional, real-world data can predict patients at risk of clinical outcomes with a high degree of accuracy, while uncovering important factors associated with outcomes that can guide clinical practice. Targeted interventions towards these patients may help reduce hypoglycemia risk and thereby favorably impact associated economic outcomes relevant to key stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.