Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009223›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

Application of Machine Learning Models to Evaluate Hypoglycemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes.

Luke Mueller, Paulos Berhanu, Jonathan Bouchard, Veronica Alas, Kenneth Elder, Ngoc Thai, Cody Hitchcock, Tiffany Hadzi, Iya Khalil, Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luke MuellerGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA. lmueller@gnshealthcare.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-8168
Paulos BerhanuSanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Jonathan BouchardSanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Veronica AlasGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kenneth ElderGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ngoc ThaiGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cody HitchcockGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tiffany HadziGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Iya KhalilGNS Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lesley-Ann Miller-WilsonSanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo identify predictors of hypoglycemia and five other clinical and economic outcomes among treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using machine learning and structured data from a large, geographically diverse administrative claims database.

methodsA retrospective cohort study design was applied to Optum Clinformatics claims data indexed on first antidiabetic prescription date. A hypothesis-free, Bayesian machine learning analytics platform (GNS Healthcare REFS™: Reverse Engineering and Forward Simulation) was used to build ensembles of generalized linear models to predict six outcomes defined in patients' 1-year post-index claims history, including hypoglycemia, antidiabetic class persistence, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target attainment, HbA1c change, T2D-related inpatient admissions, and T2D-related medical costs. A unified set of 388 variables defined in patients' 1-year pre-index claims history constituted the set of predictors for all REFS models.

resultsThe derivation cohort comprised 453,487 patients with a T2D diagnosis between 2014 and 2017. Patients with comorbid conditions had the highest risk of hypoglycemia, including those with prior hypoglycemia (odds ratio [OR] = 25.61) and anemia (OR = 1.29). Other identified risk factors included insulin (OR = 2.84) and sulfonylurea use (OR = 1.80). Biguanide use (OR = 0.75), high blood glucose (> 125 mg/dL vs. < 100 mg/dL, OR = 0.47; 100-125 mg/dL vs. < 100 mg/dL, OR = 0.53), and missing blood glucose test (OR = 0.40) were associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Area under the curve (AUC) of the hypoglycemia model in held-out testing data was 0.77. Patients in the top 15% of predicted hypoglycemia risk constituted 50% of observed hypoglycemic events, 26% of T2D-related inpatient admissions, and 24% of all T2D-related medical costs.

conclusionsMachine learning models built within high-dimensional, real-world data can predict patients at risk of clinical outcomes with a high degree of accuracy, while uncovering important factors associated with outcomes that can guide clinical practice. Targeted interventions towards these patients may help reduce hypoglycemia risk and thereby favorably impact associated economic outcomes relevant to key stakeholders.

Indexed as

Healthcare costsHypoglycemiaMachine learningResource utilizationType 2 diabetesValue-based

Identifiers

PMID32009223
PMCPMC7048891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.