Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009209›Full record

ArticleThe patient2020

Population Preferences for Treatments When Critically Ill: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Matthew H Anstey, Imogen A Mitchell, Charlie Corke, Richard Norman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew H AnsteyIntensive Care Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Level 4 G Block, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. matthew.anstey@health.wa.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-524X
Imogen A MitchellAustralian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Charlie CorkeUniversity Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Richard NormanSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Curtin University · AUAustralian National University · AUGeelong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients in the intensive care unit are too unwell to participate in shared decision making or have not previously documented their wishes. In these situations, understanding the values of the general population could help doctors provide appropriate guidance to surrogate decision makers.

methodsUsing a discrete choice experiment design, we conducted an online survey using an Australian panel. Participants were asked about their willingness to accept treatments, faced with a variety of possible outcomes and probabilities (low, moderate or high). The outcomes were across four domains: loss of functional autonomy, pain, cognitive disability and degree of burden on others. Demographic details, prior experience of intensive care unit and current health conditions were also collected. Data were analysed using logistic regression, predicting whether respondents choose to continue active treatment or not.

resultsNine hundred and eighty-four respondents, representative of age and sex completed the web-based survey. With the increasing likelihood of negative post-intensive care unit sequelae, there was a higher probability of the respondent preferring to stop ongoing active treatment, with the largest coefficients being on caring assistance and the need for full-time residential care. Those who identified as very religious, were younger or who had children under 5 years of age were more likely to choose to continue active treatment.

conclusionsRespondents valued their independence as the most important factor in deciding whether to receive ongoing medical treatments in the intensive care unit. When clinicians are unable to obtain specific patient information, they should consider framing their decision making around the likelihood of the patient achieving functional independence rather than survival.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDecision MakingProxyAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32009209
OpenAlexW3003877630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.