Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009205›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Excellent survival and outcomes with fixed-bearing medial UKA in young patients (≤ 60 years) at minimum 10-year follow-up.

Ashim Mannan, Richard W D Pilling, Katy Mason, Patrick Stirling, David Duffy, Nick London

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashim MannanHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
Richard W D PillingHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
Katy MasonHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
Patrick StirlingReSurg SA, Rue Saint-Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland. pat@resurg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8139-8871
David DuffyHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
Nick LondonHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether long-term (10-year minimum) patient outcomes and survival of fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients aged  ≤ 60 years were favorable despite non-conventional age criteria.

methodsThe authors reviewed the records of 91 consecutive medial UKAs performed in patients aged ≤ 60 by a single surgeon. All patients received the same fixed-bearing M/G Unicompartmental Knee System. Patients records were updated, noting complications or revisions, and Oxford Knee Scores and overall satisfaction collected. If deceased, the general practitioner or next of kin provided data.

resultsOf the initial 91 knees, 10 were revised, 6 were deceased, and 1 was lost to follow-up. The final cohort of 74 knees was aged 54.3 ± 4.3 years (range 41.8-60.6) at index surgery. Using revision of any component as endpoint, the present series had a KM survival of 92.9% (CI 84.8-96.7%) at 10 years, and 87.8% (CI 78.4-93.2%) at 15 years, and a single non-fatal DVT was reported. At final follow-up of 15 ± 1.3 years (range 11-18), OKS (available for all 74 knees) was 38.4 ± 8.4 (range 18-48). Overall patients were pleased or very pleased with 72 of the knees (97%).

conclusionFixed-bearing medial UKA yields favorable results in the treatment of single compartment osteoarthritis of the knee in patients ≤ 60 years. The present study demonstrates low complication rates, good-to-excellent long-term patient outcomes, and satisfactory implant survival for this age group considering the advantages of UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAgeFunctional outcomesImplant survivalSurvivorshipUKAUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyUnicondylar

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.