Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009143›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2020

Into the wild: new yeast genomes from natural environments and new tools for their analysis.

D Libkind, D Peris, F A Cubillos, J L Steenwyk, D A Opulente, Q K Langdon, A Rokas, C T Hittinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylogenomics of aiScience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fungal-Metal Interactions: A Review of Toxicity and Homeostasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

D LibkindCentro de Referencia en Levaduras y Tecnología Cervecera (CRELTEC), Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC) - CONICET/Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250 (8400), Bariloche., Argentina.
D PerisDepartment of Food Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-CSIC, Calle Catedrático Dr. D. Agustin Escardino Benlloch n°7, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
F A CubillosMillennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio). General del Canto 51 (7500574), Santiago.
J L SteenwykDepartment of Biological Sciences, VU Station B#35-1634, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
D A OpulenteLaboratory of Genetics, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1552 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53726-4084, USA.
Q K LangdonLaboratory of Genetics, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1552 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53726-4084, USA.
A RokasDepartment of Biological Sciences, VU Station B#35-1634, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
C T HittingerLaboratory of Genetics, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1552 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53726-4084, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USVanderbilt University · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CL

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
Functional Genomics of Stress Defense in YeastR01GM083989 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GASCH, AUDREY · 2008 to 2016
$3.0M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic studies of yeasts from the wild have increased considerably in the past few years. This revolution has been fueled by advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies and a better understanding of yeast ecology and phylogeography, especially for biotechnologically important species. The present review aims to first introduce new bioinformatic tools available for the generation and analysis of yeast genomes. We also assess the accumulated genomic data of wild isolates of industrially relevant species, such as Saccharomyces spp., which provide unique opportunities to further investigate the domestication processes associated with the fermentation industry and opportunistic pathogenesis. The availability of genome sequences of other less conventional yeasts obtained from the wild has also increased substantially, including representatives of the phyla Ascomycota (e.g. Hanseniaspora) and Basidiomycota (e.g. Phaffia). Here, we review salient examples of both fundamental and applied research that demonstrate the importance of continuing to sequence and analyze genomes of wild yeasts.

Indexed as

FermentationGenome, FungalAscomycotaBasidiomycotaChromosome MappingComputational BiologyEnvironmentGenomicsHanseniasporaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSaccharomycesWineYeastsBiotechnologyHanseniasporaPhaffiaSaccharomycesWild yeast

Identifiers

PMID32009143
PMCPMC7067299
OpenAlexW3004432253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.