Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32009127›Full record

SynthesisNeurologia medico-chirurgica2020

Natural History of Meningiomas: Review with Meta-analyses.

Satoshi Nakasu, Yoko Nakasu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Meningioma in the elderly.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023
    Article
  15. Surgical Therapy of Non-Skull Base Meningiomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi NakasuDivision of Neurosurgery, Kusatsu General Hospital.
Yoko NakasuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shiga University of Medical Science.
Shiga University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observation has been a mainstay in asymptomatic meningiomas, but it may increase the risk associated with treatment due to tumor enlargement and the aging of patients. Understanding the natural course of meningiomas is important to provide appropriate treatment. The majority of previous studies investigated factors related to their growth, but failed to demonstrate their relationship with symptomatic progression (sympP) because of its rarity. We reviewed and meta-analyzed 27 studies that investigated natural courses in asymptomatic or untreated meningiomas to find clinico-radiological factors predictive of radiological progression (radioP), growth speed, and sympP. In results of time-growth analysis, two-thirds of meningiomas showed radioP defined by a volume criterion and the rate approached a plateau at 4-5 years. In growth curve analyses, about half of incidental meningiomas presented decelerating or no growth, while less than one-quarter of them grew exponentially. RadioP, growth speed [annual volume change (AVC) or relative growth rate], and sympP each had different factors related to them. Younger age, non-calcification, and high intensity on T2-weighted image were related to radioP and rapid growth speed, but not to sympP. Tumors in males and those of larger size were likely to be symptomatic in the meta-analysis. AVC (≥2.1 cm

Indexed as

HumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomagrowth curvegrowth rateincidental meningiomanatural historyvolumetry

Identifiers

PMID32009127
PMCPMC7073704
OpenAlexW3004040861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.