Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008953›Full record

ReviewPhysics of life reviews2021

The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure.

Jordan E Theriault, Liane Young, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics of life reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expectations of Reciprocal Generosity Are Specific to Equal Relationships.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neural Processes Linking Interoception to Moral Preferences Aligned with Group Consensus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  11. Interoception in pregnancy: Implications for peripartum depression.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. In search of animal normativity: a framework for studying social norms in non-human animals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rethinking Norm Psychology.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan E TheriaultDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jordan_theriault@northeastern.edu.
Liane YoungDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; Psychiatric Neuroimaging Division, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Fundamental subcortical mechanisms of affective processingU01CA193632 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, SATPUTE, AJAY · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA193632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is social pressure, and how could it be adaptive to conform to others' expectations? Existing accounts highlight the importance of reputation and social sanctions. Yet, conformist behavior is multiply determined: sometimes, a person desires social regard, but at other times she feels obligated to behave a certain way, regardless of any reputational benefit-i.e. she feels a sense of should. We develop a formal model of this sense of should, beginning from a minimal set of biological premises: that the brain is predictive, that prediction error has a metabolic cost, and that metabolic costs are prospectively avoided. It follows that unpredictable environments impose metabolic costs, and in social environments these costs can be reduced by conforming to others' expectations. We elaborate on a sense of should's benefits and subjective experience, its likely developmental trajectory, and its relation to embodied mental inference. From this individualistic metabolic strategy, the emergent dynamics unify social phenomenon ranging from status quo biases, to communication and motivated cognition. We offer new solutions to long-studied problems (e.g. altruistic behavior), and show how compliance with arbitrary social practices is compelled without explicit sanctions. Social pressure may provide a foundation in individuals on which societies can be built.

Indexed as

EmotionsInterpersonal RelationsAltruismBrainCognitionFemaleHumansSocial BehaviorAffectAllostasisEvolutionMetabolismPredictive codingSocial pressure

Identifiers

PMID32008953
PMCPMC8645214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.