Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008730›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence.

Arri Coomarasamy, Adam J Devall, Jan J Brosens, Siobhan Quenby, Mary D Stephenson, Sony Sierra, Ole B Christiansen, Rachel Small, Jane Brewin, Tracy E Roberts and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Progestogen supplementation to prevent miscarriage: Evidence and controversies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Arri CoomarasamyTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.coomarasamy@bham.ac.uk.
Adam J DevallTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Jan J BrosensTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Biomedical Research Unit in Reproductive Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Siobhan QuenbyTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Biomedical Research Unit in Reproductive Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Mary D StephensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Sony SierraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada and TRIO Fertility, Toronto Ontario, Canada.
Ole B ChristiansenCentre for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss of Western Denmark, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rachel SmallBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jane BrewinTommy's Charity, Laurence Pountney Hill, London, United Kingdom.
Tracy E RobertsInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Rima Dhillon-SmithTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Hoda HarbTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Hannah NoordaliTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Argyro PapadopoulouTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Abey EapenCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA.
Matt PriorNewcastle Fertility Centre at Life, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Times Square, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Gian Carlo Di RenzoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy and IE Sechenov First State University, Moscow, Russia.
Kim HinshawSunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton Victoria, Australia.
Mary Ann LumsdenAcademic Unit of Reproductive & Maternal Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Yacoub KhalafDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
Mariette GoddijnAcademic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Madelon van WelyAcademic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maya Al-MemarTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Phil BennettTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Tom BourneTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Raj RaiTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Lesley ReganTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Ioannis D GallosTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham · GBMiscarriage Association · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Warwick · GBAalborg University Hospital · DKIllinois College · USMonash University · AUNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSechenov University · RUSunderland Royal Hospital · GBTommy's · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Iowa Health Care · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Several small trials have suggested that progesterone supplementation may reduce the risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent or threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Reviews summarized the evidence and found that the trials were small with substantial methodologic weaknesses. Since then, the effects of first-trimester use of vaginal micronized progesterone have been evaluated in 2 large, high-quality, multicenter placebo-controlled trials, one targeting women with unexplained recurrent miscarriages (the PROMISE [PROgesterone in recurrent MIScarriagE] trial) and the other targeting women with early pregnancy bleeding (the PRISM [PRogesterone In Spontaneous Miscarriage] trial). The PROMISE trial studied 836 women from 45 hospitals in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone but with substantial statistical uncertainty. The PRISM trial studied 4153 women from 48 hospitals in the United Kingdom and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone, but with a P value of .08. A key finding, first observed in the PROMISE trial, and then replicated in the PRISM trial, was that treatment with vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily was associated with increasing live birth rates according to the number of previous miscarriages. Prespecified PRISM trial subgroup analysis in women with the dual risk factors of previous miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding fulfilled all 11 conditions for credible subgroup analysis. For the subgroup of women with a history of 1 or more miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding, the live birth rate was 75% (689/914) with progesterone vs 70% (619/886) with placebo (rate difference 5%; risk ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.15; P=.003). The benefit was greater for the subgroup of women with 3 or more previous miscarriages and current pregnancy bleeding; live birth rate was 72% (98/137) with progesterone vs 57% (85/148) with placebo (rate difference 15%; risk ratio, 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.51; P=.004). No short-term safety concerns were identified from the PROMISE and PRISM trials. Therefore, women with a history of miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy may benefit from the use of vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily. Women and their care providers should use the findings for shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAbortion, ThreatenedAdministration, IntravaginalFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProgesteroneProgestinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeProgesteroneProgestinsbleedingluteal phase deficiencymeta-analysisrecurrent miscarriagethreatened miscarriagevaginal micronized progesterone

Identifiers

PMID32008730
PMCPMC7408486
OpenAlexW3003912962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.