ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020
Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence.
Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progestogen therapy in threatened miscarriage and unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: Recommendations by the Thai interest group.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Guideline
- Progestogens in women with threatened miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage: A meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Gushen Antai Pills combined with dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Predicting of early miscarriage based on machine learning: a retrospective cohort study in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- Adnexal Torsion of a Luteinized Ovarian Cyst in Early Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
- Progesterone Exposure in Pregnancy, Obstetric Stabilization, and Developmental Outcomes: A Focused Review of Direct and Indirect Pathways.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Progestogen supplementation to prevent miscarriage: Evidence and controversies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Intravaginal progesterone as a fertility-sparing treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis: preliminary results from a monocentric study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Observational
- A multivariable risk prediction model for pregnancies of uncertain viability without a fetal pole: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Stalling of the endometrial decidual reaction determines the recurrence risk of miscarriage.Science advances · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Patients with Recurrent Miscarriage: A Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Constructing a logistic regression-based prediction model for subsequent early pregnancy loss in women with pregnancy loss.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Untargeted metabolomics reveals key pathways in miscarriage: steroid, folate, fatty acid & glycosaminoglycan metabolism.npj women's health · 2025Article
- A risk prediction model of spontaneous miscarriage in women with threatened miscarriage: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Use of oral allylestrenol in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A retrospective clinical trial.Global health & medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- The predictive value of ultrasound markers for pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progesterone is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Several small trials have suggested that progesterone supplementation may reduce the risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent or threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Reviews summarized the evidence and found that the trials were small with substantial methodologic weaknesses. Since then, the effects of first-trimester use of vaginal micronized progesterone have been evaluated in 2 large, high-quality, multicenter placebo-controlled trials, one targeting women with unexplained recurrent miscarriages (the PROMISE [PROgesterone in recurrent MIScarriagE] trial) and the other targeting women with early pregnancy bleeding (the PRISM [PRogesterone In Spontaneous Miscarriage] trial). The PROMISE trial studied 836 women from 45 hospitals in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone but with substantial statistical uncertainty. The PRISM trial studied 4153 women from 48 hospitals in the United Kingdom and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone, but with a P value of .08. A key finding, first observed in the PROMISE trial, and then replicated in the PRISM trial, was that treatment with vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily was associated with increasing live birth rates according to the number of previous miscarriages. Prespecified PRISM trial subgroup analysis in women with the dual risk factors of previous miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding fulfilled all 11 conditions for credible subgroup analysis. For the subgroup of women with a history of 1 or more miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding, the live birth rate was 75% (689/914) with progesterone vs 70% (619/886) with placebo (rate difference 5%; risk ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.15; P=.003). The benefit was greater for the subgroup of women with 3 or more previous miscarriages and current pregnancy bleeding; live birth rate was 72% (98/137) with progesterone vs 57% (85/148) with placebo (rate difference 15%; risk ratio, 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.51; P=.004). No short-term safety concerns were identified from the PROMISE and PRISM trials. Therefore, women with a history of miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy may benefit from the use of vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily. Women and their care providers should use the findings for shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.