ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020
Vitamin Substitution Beyond Childhood—Requirements and Risks
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cross-sectional study exploring general practitioners' views on dietary supplements.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Exploring Vitamin B12 Supplementation in the Vegan Population: A Scoping Review of the Evidence.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Improved Stability of a Stable Crystal Form C of 6S-5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Calcium Salt, Method Development and Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for Rat Pharmacokinetic Comparison.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Commentary: Vitamin C and Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Vitamin BCurrent medical science · 2020Article
- Pseudo-Quantified Data.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamins are vitally important, but they are not always adequately supplied with the diet. In this review, we present the advantages and disadvantages of vitamin supplementation and the indications for it in various life situations.
methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature.
resultsThe German National Nutrition Survey II (Nationale Verzehrsstudie II) showed that most people in Germany consume adequate amounts of vitamins in their diet, with the exception of vitamin D and folate. Supplements are often taken by adults who already consume a balanced diet. Depending on the vitamin, 3-13% of survey respondents took vitamin supplements; the ones most often taken were vitamins C and E. No convincing evidence has yet demonstrated a health benefit from vitamin supplementation in addition to a balanced diet for the primary prevention of nutrition-associated diseases. Vitamin supplementation is indicated in certain specific life situations, e.g., pregnancy, but otherwise unnecessary, unless a deficiency has been diagnosed or the individual is at elevated risk.
conclusionVitamin supplementation is recommended for certain population groups: folic acid for pregnant women, vitamin B12 for vegans and persons with resorption disorders, vitamin D for persons with insufficient endogenous synthesis. In all other cases, it should first be tested whether the individual might be substantially helped by dietary changes alone. In general, the potential adverse effects of vitamin supplementation need to be considered, and its benefits weighed against its risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.