Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008422›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2020

Unsupervised Machine Learning Reveals Novel Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Phenotypes with Distinct Acute Injury Profiles and Long-Term Outcomes.

Kaitlin A Folweiler, Danielle K Sandsmark, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Akiva S Cohen, Aaron J Masino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaitlin A FolweilerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Danielle K SandsmarkDepartment of Neurology and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ramon Diaz-ArrastiaDepartment of Neurology and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Akiva S CohenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aaron J MasinoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Injury-Induced Alterations in Limbic Functional CircuityR37HD059288 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI COHEN, AKIVA S · 2014 to 2023
$4.3M
Natural History of Traumatic Microvascular InjuryK23NS104239 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SANDSMARK, DANIELLE KAYE · 2017 to 2021
$929k
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD059288NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS104239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a core challenge for the success of interventional clinical trials. Data-driven approaches for patient stratification may help to identify TBI patient phenotypes during the acute injury period as well as facilitate targeted trial patient enrollment and analysis of treatment efficacy. In this study, we implemented an unsupervised machine learning approach to identify TBI subpopulations at injury baseline using data from 1213 TBI patients who participated in the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT) Trial. A wrapper framework utilizing generalized low-rank models automatically selected relevant clinical features that were subsequently used to cluster patients using a partitioning around medoids clustering algorithm. Using this approach, we identified three patient phenotypes with unique clinical injury profiles based on a subset of acute injury features. Phenotype-specific differences in long-term functional outcome trajectories were respectively observed at 3 and 6 months after injury. In comparison, when patients were grouped by baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), no differences in baseline clinical feature profiles or long-term outcomes were observed. To test phenotype reproducibility in an external validation data set, we used a K-nearest neighbors algorithm to classify subjects in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Pilot data set into corresponding phenotypes, then measured the Gower's dissimilarities between TRACK-TBI and COBRIT subjects in each phenotype. No significant differences were found between trial subjects within two phenotypes, suggesting that these phenotypes may be generalizable within a broad range of TBI severity. Further, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) outcomes in the TRACK-TBI data set similarly demonstrated phenotype-specific differences in long-term outcomes. Our results suggest that unsupervised machine learning is a promising and effective approach for discovery of novel injury subpopulations over the conventional GCS-based method, and may improve patient selection in future TBI clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPhenotypeUnsupervised Machine LearningAdolescentAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultclinical trialGCSmachine learningTBIunsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID32008422
PMCPMC7249479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.