Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008213›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision.

M X Bjoern, S K Perdawood

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05671809 (Effects of Different Treatment for Anorectal Function of Patients With Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05671809 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Different Treatment for Anorectal Function of Patients With Rectal Cancer: a Study Protocol for a Prospective, Observational, Controlled, Multicentre Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled402ConditionsRectal CancerArmsNCRT with surgery, or NCT with surgery, or surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Outcomes after Transanal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented?International journal of colorectal disease · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M X BjoernDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark. mxbjoern@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-7865
S K PerdawoodDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKSlagelse Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common following surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) involves intraoperative stretching of the anal sphincter while an anal single port is placed, which can potentially further disturb anorectal function. The aim of our study was to systematically assess anal function after TaTME using anorectal manometry and questionnaires.

methodsPatients who had TaTME for rectal cancer at our institution were prospectively assessed by means of anorectal manometry and the standard LARS score. The primary endpoint was the resting pressure to assess internal sphincter damage and the secondary endpoints were squeeze pressure to assess external anal sphincter and analysis of correlation between LARS score and these two manometry parameters. Patients who had laparoscopic TME (LaTME) served as a control group.

resultsOut of 81 patients invited to participate 48 accepted. There were 36 in theTaTMEgroup, and 12 in the LaTMEgroup. The mean follow-up time from the index operation date to the assessment date was 41.34 months (± SD 24.834). The mean resting pressure did not differ significantly between the groups (36.44 mmHg ± 18.514 and 36.58 mmHg ± 13.318 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.981). The mean squeeze pressure was also comparable (125.00 mmHg ± 66.141 and 111.83 mmHg ± 51.111 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.533). The mean LARS score was comparable and showed comparable results. The analysis of correlation between LARS score and manometry parameters showed no significant associations between resting or squeeze pressure and L:ARS score.

conclusionsFollowing TME surgery, the resting and squeeze pressures of the anal sphincter measured by manometry were generally decreased, with no differences between the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAnal CanalHumansManometryPostoperative ComplicationsRectumSyndromeFunctional outcomesLARSManometryRectal cancer surgeryTaTME

Identifiers

PMID32008213
OpenAlexW3004136601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.