Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008209›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2020

Incorporating variability of patient inflow conditions into statistical models for aneurysm rupture assessment.

Felicitas J Detmer, Fernando Mut, Martin Slawski, Sven Hirsch, Philippe Bijlenga, Juan R Cebral

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05526352 (@neurIST), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05526352 recruitingnot on this map

@neurIST : Informatique biomédicale intégrée Pour la Gestion Des anévrismes cérébraux

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, GenevaRan2015 to 2040Enrolled20,000ConditionsIntracranial Aneurysm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicitas J DetmerBioengineering Department, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. fdetmer@gmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-0355
Fernando MutBioengineering Department, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Martin SlawskiStatistics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Sven HirschInstitute of Applied Simulation, ZHAW University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Philippe BijlengaNeurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Department, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
Juan R CebralBioengineering Department, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
George Mason University · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

Improving Cerebral Aneurysm Risk Assessment through Understanding Wall Vulnerability and Failure ModesR01NS097457 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CEBRAL, JUAN R, ROBERTSON, ANNE MARIE · 2016 to 2025
$6.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodynamic patterns have been associated with cerebral aneurysm instability. For patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, the inflow rates of a patient are typically not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of inter- and intra-patient variations of cerebral blood flow on the computed hemodynamics through CFD simulations and to incorporate these variations into statistical models for aneurysm rupture prediction.

methodsImage data of 1820 aneurysms were used for patient-specific steady CFD simulations with nine different inflow rates per case, capturing inter- and intra-patient flow variations. Based on the computed flow fields, 17 hemodynamic parameters were calculated and compared for the different flow conditions. Next, statistical models for aneurysm rupture were trained in 1571 of the aneurysms including hemodynamic parameters capturing the flow variations either by defining hemodynamic "response variables" (model A) or repeatedly randomly selecting flow conditions by patients (model B) as well as morphological and patient-specific variables. Both models were evaluated in the remaining 249 cases.

resultsAll hemodynamic parameters were significantly different for the varying flow conditions (p < 0.001). Both the flow-independent "response" model A and the flow-dependent model B performed well with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8182 and 0.8174 ± 0.0045, respectively.

conclusionsThe influence of inter- and intra-patient flow variations on computed hemodynamics can be taken into account in multivariate aneurysm rupture prediction models achieving a good predictive performance. Such models can be applied to CFD data independent of the specific inflow boundary conditions.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsPatient-Specific ModelingAneurysm, RupturedBiological Variation, PopulationCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedCerebral aneurysmComputational fluid dynamicsHemodynamicsPredictionRisk factorsRupture

Identifiers

PMID32008209
PMCPMC7172014
OpenAlexW3004200080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.