ArticleActa neurochirurgica2020
Incorporating variability of patient inflow conditions into statistical models for aneurysm rupture assessment.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05526352 (@neurIST), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
@neurIST : Informatique biomédicale intégrée Pour la Gestion Des anévrismes cérébraux
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences Between Ruptured Aneurysms With and Without Blebs: Mechanistic Implications.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Intracranial Aneurysm Classifier Using Phenotypic Factors: An International Pooled Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Flow reversal in distal collaterals as a possible mechanism of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after flow diversion treatment of cerebral aneurysms.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Analysis of the wall thickness of intracranial aneurysms: Can computational fluid dynamics detect the translucent areas of saccular intracranial aneurysms and predict the rupture risk preoperatively?Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Adaptive Remodeling in the Elastase-induced Rabbit Aneurysms.Experimental mechanics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHemodynamic patterns have been associated with cerebral aneurysm instability. For patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, the inflow rates of a patient are typically not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of inter- and intra-patient variations of cerebral blood flow on the computed hemodynamics through CFD simulations and to incorporate these variations into statistical models for aneurysm rupture prediction.
methodsImage data of 1820 aneurysms were used for patient-specific steady CFD simulations with nine different inflow rates per case, capturing inter- and intra-patient flow variations. Based on the computed flow fields, 17 hemodynamic parameters were calculated and compared for the different flow conditions. Next, statistical models for aneurysm rupture were trained in 1571 of the aneurysms including hemodynamic parameters capturing the flow variations either by defining hemodynamic "response variables" (model A) or repeatedly randomly selecting flow conditions by patients (model B) as well as morphological and patient-specific variables. Both models were evaluated in the remaining 249 cases.
resultsAll hemodynamic parameters were significantly different for the varying flow conditions (p < 0.001). Both the flow-independent "response" model A and the flow-dependent model B performed well with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8182 and 0.8174 ± 0.0045, respectively.
conclusionsThe influence of inter- and intra-patient flow variations on computed hemodynamics can be taken into account in multivariate aneurysm rupture prediction models achieving a good predictive performance. Such models can be applied to CFD data independent of the specific inflow boundary conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.