Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008138›Full record

Observational studyClinical & experimental metastasis2020

Poor perfusion of the microvasculature in peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer.

Arnoud W Kastelein, Laura M C Vos, Juliette O A M van Baal, Jasper J Koning, Vashendriya V V Hira, Rienk Nieuwland, Willemien J van Driel, Zühre Uz, Thomas M van Gulik, Jacco van Rheenen and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Landscape of ctDNA in Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arnoud W KasteleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.w.kastelein@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4167-1663
Laura M C VosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Juliette O A M van BaalCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper J KoningDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Free University, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vashendriya V V HiraCancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rienk NieuwlandLaboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry and Vesicle Observation Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willemien J van DrielCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zühre UzDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacco van RheenenDepartment of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute and Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Can InceDepartment of Translational Physiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Paul W R RooversDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3069-6382
Cornelis J F van NoordenCancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-0505
Christianne A R LokCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-7299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) suffer from peritoneal carcinomatosis upon first clinical presentation. Extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis has a poor prognosis and its pathophysiology is not well understood. Although treatment with systemic intravenous chemotherapy is often initially successful, peritoneal recurrences occur regularly. We hypothesized that insufficient or poorly-perfused microvasculature may impair the therapeutic efficacy of systemic intravenous chemotherapy but may also limit expansive and invasive growth characteristic of peritoneal EOC metastases. In 23 patients with advanced EOC or suspicion thereof, we determined the angioarchitecture and perfusion of the microvasculature in peritoneum and in peritoneal metastases using incident dark field (IDF) imaging. Additionally, we performed immunohistochemical analysis and 3-dimensional (3D) whole tumor imaging using light sheet fluorescence microscopy of IDF-imaged tissue sites. In all metastases, microvasculature was present but the angioarchitecture was chaotic and the vessel density and perfusion of vessels was significantly lower than in unaffected peritoneum. Immunohistochemical analysis showed expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia inducible factor 1α, and 3D imaging demonstrated vascular continuity between metastases and the vascular network of the peritoneum beneath the elastic lamina of the peritoneum. We conclude that perfusion of the microvasculature within metastases is limited, which may cause hypoxia, affect the behavior of EOC metastases on the peritoneum and limit the response of EOC metastases to systemic treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCell HypoxiaChemotherapy, AdjuvantCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitImaging, Three-DimensionalImmunohistochemistryMicrovesselsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanEOCIncident dark field imagingMicrocirculationMicrovasculaturePeritoneal carcinomatosa

Identifiers

PMID32008138
PMCPMC7138772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.