Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008117›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2020

Blood Pressure Variability in Pregnancy: an Opportunity to Develop Improved Prognostic and Risk Assessment Tools.

Jane V Vermunt, Stephen H Kennedy, Vesna D Garovic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane V VermuntNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen H KennedyNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Vesna D GarovicDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Garovic.Vesna@mayo.edu.
University of Oxford · GBMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and future coronary artery diseaseR01HL136348 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GAROVIC, VESNA D · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review discusses the mortality and morbidity of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and the current diagnostic thresholds. It then explores measurement of variability in blood pressure (BP) during pregnancy as an opportunity to identify women at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. RECENT

findingsHDP is known to be associated with increased risk of long-term CVD. Current CVD prognostic tools do not incorporate a history of HDP given a lack of improved risk discrimination. However, HDP diagnostic criteria are currently based on a binary threshold, and there is some evidence for the use of variability in BP throughout gestation as a marker of CVD risk. HDP increases long-term risk of CVD. Future studies investigating changes in diagnostic criteria, including the use of BP variability, may improve long-term CVD risk prediction and be incorporated into future risk assessment tools.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedFemaleHumansPregnancyPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBlood pressureCardiovascular disease riskHypertensionPregnancyVariability

Identifiers

PMID32008117
PMCPMC7259977
OpenAlexW3004380083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.