Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008080›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Age and sex differences in numerical responses, dietary shifts, and total responses of a generalist predator to population dynamics of main prey.

Giulia Masoero, Toni Laaksonen, Chiara Morosinotto, Erkki Korpimäki

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hunting Site Behaviour of Sympatric Common BuzzardAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A cross-taxonomic explanatory framework for mobbing behavior.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia MasoeroSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland. giulia.masoero@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-7726
Toni LaaksonenSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-7131
Chiara MorosinottoSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9172-894X
Erkki KorpimäkiSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-1955

Funding

Academy of Finland 123379Academy of Finland 136717Academy of Finland 250709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluctuations in the abundance of main prey species might shape animal communities, by inducing numerical responses and dietary shifts in predators. Whether numerical responses and dietary shifts differ among individuals of different age and sex has so far gained little attention. These differences could affect how much predators consume main and alternative prey, thus causing variation in predation pressure on main and alternative prey species. We studied the effect of fluctuating main prey abundance (voles) in autumn on the age and sex composition of a food-hoarding population of Eurasian pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum (327 individuals), and on the species composition of their food stores in western Finland during 2003-2017 (629 food stores). Numbers of yearlings (< 1-year old) of both sexes and adult (+ 1-year old) females increased with increasing vole abundance. During low vole abundance, adult owls stored more small birds and less small mammals than yearlings. Females stored more small mammals than males and showed a tendency to store less birds. The amount of consumed birds (the most important alternative prey), and in particular of crested, willow, great, and blue tits, increased with low vole densities. Our results show that numerical, functional, and total responses of pygmy owls, and probably also other vertebrate predators, to the availability of the main prey in winter are shaped by the age and sex composition of the predator population, which both show large spatio-temporal variation in boreal forests.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorStrigiformesAnimalsArvicolinaeFemaleFinlandHorsesMalePopulation DynamicsBoreal forestFood hoardingFunctional responseIntraspecific variationPredator–prey interactionsStarvation riskVole cycle

Identifiers

PMID32008080
PMCPMC7058601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.