Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008074›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Analysis of the effectiveness of the prophylaxis of vestibular migraine depending on the diagnostic category and the prescribed drug.

E Domínguez-Durán, M A Montilla-Ibáñez, M G Álvarez-Morujo de Sande, E Domènech-Vadillo, C Bécares-Martínez, R González-Aguado, G Guerra-Jiménez

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of Nortriptyline and Migraine Lifestyle Modifications in Vestibular Migraine Management.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. [The efficacy of topiramate and flunarizine hydrochloride for prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E Domínguez-DuránHospital Infanta Luisa, Calle San Jacinto 87, 41010, Sevilla, Spain. emiliodominguezorl@gmail.com.
M A Montilla-IbáñezComplejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
M G Álvarez-Morujo de SandeHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
E Domènech-VadilloHospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
C Bécares-MartínezHospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Spain.
R González-AguadoHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
G Guerra-JiménezComplejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVestibular migraine (VM) consists of recurrent episodes of vestibular symptoms that are accompanied by migraine in at least 50% of the episodes. The criteria of the Bárány Society include two diagnostic categories: "actual" vestibular migraine and probable vestibular migraine. There is a wide range of drugs that can be prescribed for the prophylactic treatment of VM, but recommendations for the selection of the most appropriate drug are currently lacking.

objectiveTo measure the extent to which the prophylactic treatment of VM reduces vestibular symptoms, headache and the number of crises depending on the diagnostic category of the Bárány Society and the drug used for prophylaxis. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a multicenter prospective study. Patients with VM who presented to any of the participating centers and who subsequently met the VM criteria were prescribed one of the following types of prophylaxis: acetazolamide, amitriptyline, flunarizine, propranolol or topiramate. Patients were called back for a follow-up visit 5 weeks later. This allowed the intensity of vestibular symptoms, headache and the number of crises before and during treatment to be compared.

results31 Patients met the inclusion criteria. During the treatment, all the measured variables decreased significantly. In a visual analogue scale, the intensity of vestibular symptoms decreased by 45.8 points, the intensity of headache decreased by 47.8 points and patients suffered from 15.6 less monthly crises compared to the period before the treatment. No significant between-group differences were found when patients were divided based on their diagnostic category or the choice of prophylaxis prescribed to them.

conclusionThe treatment of VM produces a reduction of symptoms and crises with no significant differences based on patients' diagnostic categories or the choice of prophylaxis prescribed to them.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersVestibular DiseasesAcetazolamideAmitriptylineAnalgesicsCentral Nervous System AgentsFlunarizineHumansPropranololProspective StudiesTopiramateVertigoAcetazolamideAmitriptylineAnalgesicsCentral Nervous System AgentsFlunarizinePropranololTopiramateProbable vestibular migraineProphylaxisTreatmentVestibular migraine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.