Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32008006›Full record

ArticlePhonetica2020

Effects of Ultrasound Familiarization on Production and Perception of Nonnative Contrasts.

Kevin D Roon, Jaekoo Kang, D H Whalen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phonetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin D RoonProgram in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA, kroon@gc.cuny.edu.
Jaekoo KangProgram in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA.
D H WhalenProgram in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Making DeepEdge, a tool for ultrasound analysis, cloud-accessible.R01DC002717 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WHALEN, DOUGLAS H · 1996 to 2022
$12.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsWe investigated the efficacy of ultrasound imaging of the tongue as a tool for familiarizing naïve learners with the production of a class of nonnative speech sounds: palatalized Russian consonants.

methodsTwo learner groups were familiarized, one with ultrasound and one with audio only. Learners performed pre- and postfamiliarization production and discrimination tasks.

resultsRatings of productions of word-final palatalized consonants by learners from both groups improved after familiarization, as did discrimination of the palatalization contrast word-finally. There were no significant differences in the improvement between groups in either task. All learners were able to generalize to novel contexts in production and discrimination. The presence of palatalization interfered with discrimination of word-initial manner, and ultrasound learners were more successful in overcoming that interference.

conclusionUltrasound familiarization resulted in improvements in production and discrimination comparable to audio only. Ultrasound familiarization additionally helped learners overcome difficulties in manner discrimination introduced by palatalization. When familiarizing learners with a novel, nonnative class of sounds, a small set of stimuli in different contexts may be more beneficial than using a larger set in one context. Although untrained production can disrupt discrimination training, we found that production familiarization was not disruptive to discrimination or production.

Indexed as

LanguageLearningPhoneticsSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleRussiaTongueUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32008006
PMCPMC9188028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.