Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32007543›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2020

Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Stephen Hasak, Rena Yadlapati, Osama Altayar, Rami Sweis, Emily Tucker, Kevin Knowles, Mark Fox, John Pandolfino, C Prakash Gyawali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. pHoenix score discriminative ability in suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease: a high-volume single-center external validation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Reflux Testing: Wireless pH, Impedance-pH, and Mucosal Impedance.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Optimizing the Management Algorithm for Heartburn in General Gastroenterology: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Minimization Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Novel Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review article: Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  12. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Diagnostic thresholds and optimal collection protocol of salivary pepsin for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen HasakDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Rena YadlapatiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Osama AltayarDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Rami SweisGI Physiology Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Emily TuckerNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kevin KnowlesNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark FoxNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Digestive Function: Basel, Laboratory and Clinic for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function, Center for Integrative Gastroenterology, Klinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
John PandolfinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: cprakash@wustl.edu.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBWashington University in St. Louis · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
CLINICAL/LABORATORY TRAINING ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007130 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW AARON CIORBA · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
Role of altered response to volumetric distension in esophageal diseaseP01DK117824 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2018 to 2022
$7.3M
Targeting Hypervigilance and Autonomic Arousal: the Psycho-physiologic Model of GERDR01DK092217 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JOHN E PANDOLFINO · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
Training Grant in Gastrointestinal Physiology and PsychologyT32DK101363 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2014 to 2018
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK117824NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092217NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007130NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK101363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsWireless pH monitoring measures esophageal acid exposure time (AET) for up to 96 hours. We evaluated competing methods of analysis of wireless pH data.

methodsAdult patients with persisting reflux symptoms despite acid suppression (n = 322, 48.5 ± 0.9 years, 61.7% women) from 2 tertiary centers were evaluated using symptom questionnaires and wireless pH monitoring off therapy, from November 2013 through September 2017; 30 healthy adults (control subjects; 26.9 ± 1.5 years; 60.0% women) were similarly evaluated. Concordance of daily AET (physiologic <4%, borderline 4%-6%, pathologic>6%) for 2 or more days constituted the predominant AET pattern. Each predominant pattern (physiologic, borderline, or pathologic) in relation to data from the first day, and total averaged AET, were compared with other interpretation paradigms (first 2 days, best day, or worst day) and with symptoms.

resultsAt least 2 days of AET data were available from 96.9% of patients, 3 days from 90.7%, and 4 days from 72.7%. A higher proportion of patients had a predominant pathologic pattern (31.4%) than control subjects (11.1%; P = .03). When 3 or more days of data were available, 90.4% of patients had a predominant AET pattern; when 2 days of data were available, 64.1% had a predominant AET pattern (P < .001). Day 1 AET was discordant with the predominant pattern in 22.4% of patients and was less strongly associated with the predominant pattern compared with 48 hour AET (P = .059) or total averaged AET (P = .02). Baseline symptom burden was higher in patients with a predominant pathologic pattern compared with a predominant physiologic pattern (P = .02).

conclusionsThe predominant AET pattern on prolonged wireless pH monitoring can identify patients at risk for reflux symptoms and provides gains over 24 hours and 48 hours recording, especially when results from the first 2 days are discordant or borderline.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxProton Pump InhibitorsAdultEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesProton Pump InhibitorsDiagnosticGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseGERDPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID32007543
PMCPMC7392797
OpenAlexW3004048765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.