Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32007431›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2020

Cognitive Modeling Informs Interpretation of Go/No-Go Task-Related Neural Activations and Their Links to Externalizing Psychopathology.

Alexander Weigard, Mary Soules, Bailey Ferris, Robert A Zucker, Chandra Sripada, Mary Heitzeg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Posterior Cingulate Cortex Reflects the Impact of Anxiety on Drift Rates During Cognitive Processing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander WeigardDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: asweigar@med.umich.edu.
Mary SoulesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bailey FerrisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Robert A ZuckerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Chandra SripadaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mary HeitzegDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY ALCOHOLISM RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32AA007477 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Maureen A. Walton · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
RISK AND COPING IN CHILDREN OF ALCOHOLICSR01AA007065 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HEITZEG, MARY M · 1987 to 2017
$6.1M
Developmental neurobiological and contextual influences on alcohol use disorderR01AA025790 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HEITZEG, MARY M, HICKS, BRIAN M · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA007065NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025790NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other externalizing psychopathologies tend to display poor behavioral performance on the go/no-go task, which is thought to reflect deficits in inhibitory control. However, clinical neuroimaging studies using this task have yielded conflicting results, raising basic questions about what the task measures and which aspects of the task relate to clinical outcomes. We used computational modeling to provide a clearer understanding of how neural activations from this task relate to the cognitive mechanisms that underlie performance and to probe the implications of these relationships for clinical research.

methodsA total of 143 young adults (8-21 years of age) performed the go/no-go task during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. We used the diffusion decision model (DDM), a cognitive modeling approach, to quantify distinct neurocognitive processes that underlie go/no-go performance. We then assessed correlations between DDM parameters and brain activation from standard go/no-go contrasts and assessed relationships of DDM parameters and associated neural measures with clinical ratings.

resultsRight-lateralized prefrontal activations on correct inhibition trials, which are generally assumed to isolate neural processes involved in inhibition, were unrelated to DDM parameters (and other performance indices). However, responses to failed inhibitions in brain regions associated with error monitoring were strongly related to more efficient task performance and correlated with externalizing behavior and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.

conclusionsOur findings cast doubt on conventional interpretations of go/no-go task-related activations as reflecting the neural basis of inhibitory functioning. We instead found evidence that error-related contrasts provide clinically relevant information about neural systems involved in monitoring and optimizing the efficiency of cognitive performance.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityPsychopathologyBrain MappingCognitionHumansInhibition, PsychologicalYoung AdultADHDComputational psychiatryDiffusion decision modelError-monitoring systemsExternalizingInhibitory control

Identifiers

PMID32007431
PMCPMC7214209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.