Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32007104›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation.

Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Elie A Akl, Joanne Khabsa, Lyubov Lytvyn, Pearl Atwere, Pauline Campbell, Kalipso Chalkidou, Stephanie M Chang, Sally Crowe and 30 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Guideline
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Jennifer PetkovicBruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care and University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. jennifer.petkovic@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-584X
Alison RiddleBruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care and University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Joanne KhabsaClinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lyubov LytvynMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pearl AtwereBruyère Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pauline CampbellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Kalipso ChalkidouFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health Imperial College, London, UK.
Stephanie M ChangAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sally CroweCrowe Associates Ltd., Oxford, UK.
Leonila DansDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, University of the Philippines-Manila, Taft Ave, 1000, Manila, Philippines.
Fadi El JardaliAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Davina GhersiNational Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sean GrantDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Blvd, RG 6046, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Regina Greer-SmithLLC/S.T.A.R. Initiative, Apple Valley, CA, USA.
Jeanne-Marie GuiseDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science, University School of Medicine and the OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, USA.
Glen HazlewoodUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Janet JullSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
S Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, UK.
Etienne V LangloisAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne LyddiattCochrane Musculoskeletal Group, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lara MaxwellUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Richard MorleyThe Cochrane Collaboration, Cochrane Consumer Network, London, UK.
Reem A MustafaDepartment of Internal Medicine/Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.
Francesco NoninoUnit of Epidemiology and Statistics, IRCCS - Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jordi Pardo PardoOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Alex PollockNursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Kevin PottieDepartments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
John RivaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Holger SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
Rosiane SimeonBruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care and University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Maureen SmithCochrane Consumer Executive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Airton T SteinPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA, Rua Sarmento Leite 245, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Anneliese SynnotCentre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Janice TuftePCORI, Seattle, USA.
Howard WhiteAlfred Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Vivian WelchBruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care and University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas W ConcannonThe RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter TugwellUniversity of Ottawa, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17CIHR FDN 143237CIHR PJT-155970Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Medical Research Council MRC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MRC_UU_12017/15World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStakeholder engagement has become widely accepted as a necessary component of guideline development and implementation. While frameworks for developing guidelines express the need for those potentially affected by guideline recommendations to be involved in their development, there is a lack of consensus on how this should be done in practice. Further, there is a lack of guidance on how to equitably and meaningfully engage multiple stakeholders. We aim to develop guidance for the meaningful and equitable engagement of multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation.

methodsThis will be a multi-stage project. The first stage is to conduct a series of four systematic reviews. These will (1) describe existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (2) characterize barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (3) explore the impact of stakeholder engagement on guideline development and implementation, and (4) identify issues related to conflicts of interest when engaging multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. DISCUSSION: We will collaborate with our multiple and diverse stakeholders to develop guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. We will use the results of the systematic reviews to develop a candidate list of draft guidance recommendations and will seek broad feedback on the draft guidance via an online survey of guideline developers and external stakeholders. An invited group of representatives from all stakeholder groups will discuss the results of the survey at a consensus meeting which will inform the development of the final guidance papers. Our overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGuidelines as TopicStakeholder ParticipationSystematic Reviews as TopicFeedbackHumansCoproductionEquityGuidanceGuidelinesIntegrated knowledge translationStakeholder engagementSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID32007104
PMCPMC6995157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.