Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32007099›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial.

Kyeong Tae Kim, Sophie Morton, Sarah Howe, Yeong Shiong Chiew, Jennifer L Knopp, Paul Docherty, Christopher Pretty, Thomas Desaive, Balazs Benyo, Akos Szlavecz and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Kyeong Tae KimCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. kyeong.kim@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-9252
Sophie MortonCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sarah HoweCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Yeong Shiong ChiewSchool of Engineering, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Jennifer L KnoppCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Paul DochertyCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christopher PrettyCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Thomas DesaiveGIGA Cardiovascular Science, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Balazs BenyoDepartment of Control Engineering and Information, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Akos SzlaveczDepartment of Control Engineering and Information, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Knut MoellerInstitute of Technical Medicine (ITeM), HFU Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Geoffrey M ShawDepartment of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Geoffrey ChaseCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUChristchurch Hospital · NZFurtwangen University · DEMonash University Malaysia · MYUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 13/213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. METHODS AND

designThe CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6-8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO DISCUSSION: The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014. (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132).

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationBreath TestsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicComputer-Aided DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareOxygenOxygen ConsumptionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory SystemVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryOxygenARDSMechanical ventilationPEEP titrationPulmonary mechanicsRCTrecruitment manoeuvre

Identifiers

PMID32007099
PMCPMC6995650
OpenAlexW3003175137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.