Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006979›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020

Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context.

James D Miller, Charles S Watson, Marjorie R Leek, David J Wark, Pamela E Souza, Sandra Gordon-Salant, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James D MillerCommunication Disorders Technology, Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA.ORCID s0000000222977870
Charles S WatsonCommunication Disorders Technology, Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA.
Marjorie R LeekVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, California 92357, USA.
David J WarkCommunication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.
Pamela E SouzaCommunication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
Sandra Gordon-SalantHearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID s0000000180379724
Jayne B AhlstromDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.

Funding

Multi-site study of speech perception training for hearing-aid usersR33DC011174 · NIDCD · COMMUNICATION DISORDERS TECHNOLOGY, INC · PI WATSON, CHARLES S · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
Multi-site study of speech perception training for hearing-aid usersR21DC011174 · NIDCD · COMMUNICATION DISORDERS TECHNOLOGY, INC · PI WATSON, CHARLES S · 2010 to 2010
$200k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC011174NIDCD NIH HHS R33 DC011174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masked sentence perception by hearing-aid users is strongly correlated with three variables: (1) the ability to hear phonetic details as estimated by the identification of syllable constituents in quiet or in noise; (2) the ability to use situational context that is extrinsic to the speech signal; and (3) the ability to use inherent context provided by the speech signal itself. This approach is called "the syllable-constituent, contextual theory of speech perception" and is supported by the performance of 57 hearing-aid users in the identification of 109 syllable constituents presented in a background of 12-talker babble and the identification of words in naturally spoken sentences presented in the same babble. A simple mathematical model, inspired in large part by Boothroyd and Nittrouer [(1988). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 101-114] and Fletcher [Allen (1996) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1825-1834], predicts sentence perception from listeners' abilities to recognize isolated syllable constituents and to benefit from context. When the identification accuracy of syllable constituents is greater than about 55%, individual differences in context utilization play a minor role in determining the sentence scores. As syllable-constituent scores fall below 55%, individual differences in context utilization play an increasingly greater role in determining sentence scores. Implications for hearing-aid design goals and fitting procedures are discussed.

Indexed as

NoisePhoneticsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHearing AidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual MaskingPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID32006979
PMCPMC7043864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.