Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006430›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Effectiveness of Trivalent and Quadrivalent Inactivated Vaccines Against Influenza B in the United States, 2011-2012 to 2016-2017.

Manjusha Gaglani, Anupama Vasudevan, Chandni Raiyani, Kempapura Murthy, Wencong Chen, Michael Reis, Edward A Belongia, Huong Q McLean, Michael L Jackson, Lisa A Jackson and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Antigenic characterization of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Effect of Antigenic Drift on Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States-2019-2020.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interim estimates of 2019/20 vaccine effectiveness during early-season co-circulation of influenza A and B viruses, Canada, February 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Manjusha GaglaniBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Anupama VasudevanBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Chandni RaiyaniBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Kempapura MurthyBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Wencong ChenBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Michael ReisBaylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Edward A BelongiaMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Huong Q McLeanMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael L JacksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lisa A JacksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Richard K ZimmermanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Schools of Health Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary Patricia NowalkUniversity of Pittsburgh, Schools of Health Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Arnold S MontoUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emily T MartinUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jessie R ChungInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sarah SpencerInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alicia M FryInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brendan FlanneryInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness NetworkU01IP001034 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MONTO, ARNOLD S · 2016 to 2020
$10.0M
Annual Estimates of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness and Evaluation of Immune Response in a Wisconsin PopulationU01IP001038 · IP · MARSHFIELD CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI BELONGIA, EDWARD · 2016 to 2020
$8.0M
Prospective annual estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness and burden of diseaseU01IP001037 · IP · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JACKSON, MICHAEL L · 2016 to 2020
$7.8M
Outpatient VE for seasonal flu, pandemic flu and RSV in a large, diverse networkU01IP001035 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZIMMERMAN, RICHARD K · 2016 to 2020
$7.8M
Mandatory_Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness Against Medically-Attended, PCR-Confirmed Influenza in West South Central U.S.U01IP001039 · IP · SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI GAGLANI, MANJUSHA · 2016 to 2020
$6.5M
Core_plus_Option_A_B_Proposal for Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness ResearchU01IP000474 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MONTO, ARNOLD S · 2011 to 2015
$6.2M
Core_plus Option_A_C_Influenza Surveillance and Vaccine Effectiveness in a LargeU01IP000467 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZIMMERMAN, RICHARD K · 2011 to 2015
$5.9M
Core_plus Option_B_C_Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in a Wisconsin PopulationU01IP000471 · IP · MARSHFIELD CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI BELONGIA, EDWARD · 2011 to 2015
$5.6M
Core_Prospective population-based estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness aU01IP000466 · IP · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI JACKSON, MICHAEL L · 2011 to 2015
$4.1M
Core_RT-PCR based Case-Control: Apt Measure of Influenza Vaccine EffectivenessU01IP000473 · IP · SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI GAGLANI, MANJUSHA · 2011 to 2015
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000466NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000467NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000471NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000473NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000474NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001034NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001035NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001037NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001038NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2013, quadrivalent influenza vaccines containing 2 B viruses gradually replaced trivalent vaccines in the United States. We compared the vaccine effectiveness of quadrivalent to trivalent inactivated vaccines (IIV4 to IIV3, respectively) against illness due to influenza B during the transition, when IIV4 use increased rapidly.

methodsThe US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (Flu VE) Network analyzed 25 019 of 42 600 outpatients aged ≥6 months who enrolled within 7 days of illness onset during 6 seasons from 2011-2012. Upper respiratory specimens were tested for the influenza virus type and B lineage. Using logistic regression, we estimated IIV4 or IIV3 effectiveness by comparing the odds of an influenza B infection overall and the odds of B lineage among vaccinated versus unvaccinated participants. Over 4 seasons from 2013-2014, we compared the relative odds of an influenza B infection among IIV4 versus IIV3 recipients.

resultsTrivalent vaccines included the predominantly circulating B lineage in 4 of 6 seasons. During 4 influenza seasons when both IIV4 and IIV3 were widely used, the overall effectiveness against any influenza B was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-59) for IIV4 versus 45% (95% CI, 34-54) for IIV3. IIV4 was more effective than IIV3 against the B lineage not included in IIV3, but comparative effectiveness against illnesses related to any influenza B favored neither vaccine valency.

conclusionsThe uptake of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines was not associated with increased protection against any influenza B illness, despite the higher effectiveness of quadrivalent vaccines against the added B virus lineage. Public health impact and cost-benefit analyses are needed globally.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAgedHumansSeasonsUnited StatesVaccinationVaccines, CombinedVaccines, InactivatedInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, CombinedVaccines, Inactivatedeffectivenessinactivated influenza vaccineinfluenza B lineagequadrivalenttrivalent

Identifiers

PMID32006430
PMCPMC8028105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.