ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2020
Effect of probiotic administration on gut microbiota and depressive behaviors in mice.
Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiota-targeted interventions for depression in adolescents and young adults: Mechanisms, evidence strength and clinical strategies-A narrative review.General psychiatry · 2026Review
- Butyrate Is Associated with the Antidepressant Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- N-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids combined with pro-biotics or post-biotics synergistically alleviate dyslipidemia in rats exposed to chronic mild stress.Nutrition research and practice · 2025Article
- Gut-Brain Axis in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Review of Neurobiological Insights and Probiotic Interventions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Supplementation of the probioticAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Combined Administration of Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium Offers Enhanced Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Activity in a Dose Dependent Manner.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis-mediated ceramides elevation contributes to corticosterone-induced depression by impairing mitochondrial function.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- The Role of Gut Microbiota in Anxiety, Depression, and Other Mental Disorders as Well as the Protective Effects of Dietary Components.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Th17 cells sense microbiome to promote depressive-like behaviors.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Effects ofFood science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Probiotication of Nutritious Fruit and Vegetable Juices: An Alternative to Dairy-Based Probiotic Functional Products.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- A Reciprocal Link Between Gut Microbiota, Inflammation and Depression: A Place for Probiotics?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Gut Microbiota Associated With Effectiveness And Responsiveness to Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Improving Trait Anxiety.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Pro-biomics: Omics Technologies To Unravel the Role of Probiotics in Health and Disease.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiota is closely associated with the bidirectional gut-brain axis that modulates neuropsychological functions of the central nervous system, thereby affecting mental disorders such as depression. Although it is known that probiotics affect brain functions, the impact of probiotics on the regulation of the prevalence and composition of gut microbiota, leading to anti-depressive effects has not been well understood.
methodsMice were randomly divided into four different groups (n = 10 for each group) as follows: Group G1 (normal group) as control and group G2 (stress group) were given sterile saline via oral route daily for 8 weeks without and with stress condition, respectively. Under the stress condition, group G3 (fluoxetine group) was administered with fluoxetine hydrochloride and group G4 (probiotic group) was orally given multi-strains of probiotics daily for 8 weeks. After treatment, all mice underwent behavioral testing. Furthermore, fecal samples were collected from randomly selected 5 mice of each group on day 60 and taxonomical analysis of intestinal microbial distribution was performed.
resultsMice subjected to restraint stress showed depressive-like behaviors along with high corticosterone levels in serum. However, probiotic administration alleviated depressive-like behaviors and decreased corticosterone level. Moreover, fecal microbiota was distinctly altered in probiotic-treated mice of the stress group. The relative abundance of phylum and genus levels was significantly decreased in the stress group, but probiotic administration restored the composition of microbes restored.
conclusionIngested probiotics alter the composition of gut microbiota, likely improving the symptoms of depression. Graphical abstract Probiotic administration alters gut microbiota and reduces depressive-like behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.