Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006344›Full record

ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2020

Effect of probiotic administration on gut microbiota and depressive behaviors in mice.

Quan Feng Liu, Hong-Man Kim, Sanghyun Lim, Myung-Jun Chung, Chi-Yeon Lim, Byung-Soo Koo, Seok-Seong Kang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Butyrate Is Associated with the Antidepressant Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Supplementation of the probioticAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effects ofFood science and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quan Feng LiuDepartment of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Man KimCell Biotech R&D Center, Gimpo, Republic of Korea.
Sanghyun LimCell Biotech R&D Center, Gimpo, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Jun ChungCell Biotech R&D Center, Gimpo, Republic of Korea.
Chi-Yeon LimDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Soo KooDepartment of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. koobs@dongguk.ac.kr.
Seok-Seong KangDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Goyang, Republic of Korea. sskang@dongguk.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-9122
Dongguk University · KRCell Biotech (South Korea) · KR

Funding

Ministry of Education 2016R1D1A1B03932530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiota is closely associated with the bidirectional gut-brain axis that modulates neuropsychological functions of the central nervous system, thereby affecting mental disorders such as depression. Although it is known that probiotics affect brain functions, the impact of probiotics on the regulation of the prevalence and composition of gut microbiota, leading to anti-depressive effects has not been well understood.

methodsMice were randomly divided into four different groups (n = 10 for each group) as follows: Group G1 (normal group) as control and group G2 (stress group) were given sterile saline via oral route daily for 8 weeks without and with stress condition, respectively. Under the stress condition, group G3 (fluoxetine group) was administered with fluoxetine hydrochloride and group G4 (probiotic group) was orally given multi-strains of probiotics daily for 8 weeks. After treatment, all mice underwent behavioral testing. Furthermore, fecal samples were collected from randomly selected 5 mice of each group on day 60 and taxonomical analysis of intestinal microbial distribution was performed.

resultsMice subjected to restraint stress showed depressive-like behaviors along with high corticosterone levels in serum. However, probiotic administration alleviated depressive-like behaviors and decreased corticosterone level. Moreover, fecal microbiota was distinctly altered in probiotic-treated mice of the stress group. The relative abundance of phylum and genus levels was significantly decreased in the stress group, but probiotic administration restored the composition of microbes restored.

conclusionIngested probiotics alter the composition of gut microbiota, likely improving the symptoms of depression. Graphical abstract Probiotic administration alters gut microbiota and reduces depressive-like behaviors.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCorticosteroneDepressionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLocomotionMaleMice, Inbred ICRRestraint, PhysicalStress, PsychologicalCorticosteroneAnti-depressantDepressionGut microbiotaProbioticsStress

Identifiers

PMID32006344
PMCPMC7214553
OpenAlexW3004112707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.