Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006251›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2020

Theory and applications of differential scanning fluorimetry in early-stage drug discovery.

Kai Gao, Rick Oerlemans, Matthew R Groves

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards routine accurate electron-density studies of biological macromolecules.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Fluorescent Dyes for Differential Scanning Fluorimetry of RNA.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai GaoStructure Biology in Drug Design, Drug Design Group XB20, Departments of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rick OerlemansStructure Biology in Drug Design, Drug Design Group XB20, Departments of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matthew R GrovesStructure Biology in Drug Design, Drug Design Group XB20, Departments of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.r.groves@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9859-5177
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) is an accessible, rapid, and economical biophysical technique that has seen many applications over the years, ranging from protein folding state detection to the identification of ligands that bind to the target protein. In this review, we discuss the theory, applications, and limitations of DSF, including the latest applications of DSF by ourselves and other researchers. We show that DSF is a powerful high-throughput tool in early drug discovery efforts. We place DSF in the context of other biophysical methods frequently used in drug discovery and highlight their benefits and downsides. We illustrate the uses of DSF in protein buffer optimization for stability, refolding, and crystallization purposes and provide several examples of each. We also show the use of DSF in a more downstream application, where it is used as an in vivo validation tool of ligand-target interaction in cell assays. Although DSF is a potent tool in buffer optimization and large chemical library screens when it comes to ligand-binding validation and optimization, orthogonal techniques are recommended as DSF is prone to false positives and negatives.

Indexed as

Buffer optimizationCrystallizationFluorimetryFoldingLigands screeningRefoldingThermal stabilityUnfolding

Identifiers

PMID32006251
PMCPMC7040159
OpenAlexW3004216838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.