Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006188›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

Patients with coronary artery disease after acute myocardial infarction: effects of continuous enrollment in a structured Disease Management Program on adherence to guideline-recommended medication, health care expenditures, and survival.

Florian Kirsch, Christian Becker, Anja Schramm, Werner Maier, Reiner Leidl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian KirschInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. florian.kirsch@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-592X
Christian BeckerInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Anja SchrammAOK Bayern, Service Center of Health Care Management, Regensburg, Germany.
Werner MaierInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Reiner LeidlInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEBayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries increased risk of mortality and excess costs. Disease Management Programs (DMPs) providing guideline-recommended care for chronic diseases seem an intuitively appealing way to enhance health outcomes for patients with chronic conditions such as AMI. The aim of the study is to compare adherence to guideline-recommended medication, health care expenditures and survival of patients enrolled and not enrolled in the German DMP for coronary artery disease (CAD) after an AMI from the perspective of a third-party payer over a follow-up period of 3 years.

methodsThe study is based on routinely collected data from a regional statutory health insurance fund (n = 15,360). A propensity score matching with caliper method was conducted. Afterwards guideline-recommended medication, health care expenditures, and survival between patients enrolled and not enrolled in the DMP were compared with generalized linear and Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsThe propensity score matching resulted in 3870 pairs of AMI patients previously and continuously enrolled and not enrolled in the DMP. In the 3-year follow-up period the proportion of days covered rates for ACE-inhibitors (60.95% vs. 58.92%), anti-platelet agents (74.20% vs. 70.66%), statins (54.18% vs. 52.13%), and β-blockers (61.95% vs. 52.64%) were higher in the DMP group. Besides that, DMP participants induced lower health care expenditures per day (€58.24 vs. €72.72) and had a significantly lower risk of death (HR: 0.757).

conclusionPrevious and continuous enrollment in the DMP CAD for patients after AMI is a promising strategy as it enhances guideline-recommended medication, reduces health care expenditures and the risk of death.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementDrug MonitoringAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug CombinationsFemaleGermanyHealth ExpendituresHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsInsurance Claim ReviewKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMyocardial InfarctionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalcombotoxDrug CombinationsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAMIDMP CADGuideline-based medicationHealth care expendituresSurvival

Identifiers

PMID32006188
PMCPMC7214389
OpenAlexW3004006982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.