Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006141›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.

Mayte Gil-Candel, Juan José Gascón-Cánovas, Elena Urbieta-Sanz, Lorena Rentero-Redondo, María Onteniente-Candela, Carles Iniesta-Navalón

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mayte Gil-CandelDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, 30003, Murcia, Spain. maigc29@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-8350
Juan José Gascón-CánovasDepartment of Public Health, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Elena Urbieta-SanzDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, 30003, Murcia, Spain.
Lorena Rentero-RedondoDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, 30003, Murcia, Spain.
María Onteniente-CandelaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, 30003, Murcia, Spain.
Carles Iniesta-NavalónDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, 30003, Murcia, Spain.
Hospital Reina Sofía de Murcia · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn's disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant (p = 0.547 and p = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15-0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCohort StudiesDrug MonitoringFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal AgentsHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpainTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabDrug survivalInflammatory bowel diseaseInfliximabMedicine-withdrawalTherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID32006141
OpenAlexW3003483890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.