ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
New Screening Tool for Aortic Root Dilation in Children with Marfan Syndrome and Marfan-Like Disorders.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heritable Thoracic Aortic Diseases in Pediatric Practice: From Molecular Mechanisms to Genotype-Informed Management, a Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Reference Diameters of the Abdominal Aorta and Iliac Arteries in Different Populations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Influence of Genetic Variants on Follow-Up Results in Patients Surviving Thoracic Aortic Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ocular, cardiovascular, and genetic characteristics and their associations in children with Marfan syndrome and related fibrillinopathies.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Cardiac abnormalities in girls with Turner syndrome: ECG abnormalities, myocardial strain imaging, and karyotype-phenotype associations.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2021Article
- Is there a new method for determining aortic root dilatation in children?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the roles of a pediatric cardiologist who suspects or diagnoses a genetically determined connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos, and Loeys-Dietz syndromes) is to assess whether the aortic root is dilated. The aortic root diameter is affected by the patient's age, sex, and body surface area. Therefore, the aortic root diameter needs to be determined and expressed as a z-score. Calculation of the z-score is time-consuming and problematic if used infrequently. This study aimed to introduce a simple screening method for identifying aortic root dilation in children. The study population consisted of 190 children who were diagnosed with Marfan syndrome or Marfan-like disorders. The aortic root ratio (ARr) was formulated. The value of the ARr was compared in each patient with the results in z-scores, which were obtained using on-line calculators based on the most widespread nomograms. The optimal cut-off value of the ARr was ≥ 18.7. At this cut-off point, the sensitivity of the ARr ranged from 88.3% to 100% and the specificity ranged from 94% to 97.8%. All of the patients in whom the ARr failed to identify aortic root dilation were also divergently classified by different nomograms. At the ARr cut-off point of ≥ 18.0, a sensitivity of 100% was achieved for all nomograms with minimal reduction in specificity. The ARr allows for rapid and precise screening for aortic root dilation in children. Unlike classic analysis, the ARr does not require nomograms or on-line calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.