ArticlePediatric radiology2020
Air contrast enema reduction of single and recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in children: patterns, management and outcomes.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rebound of pediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception following the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal follow-up study.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Predicting bowel necrosis in pediatric acute intussusception using roundness and other related factors.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Recurrent Ileocolic Intussusception in Children: A Scoping Review.International journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- Risk factors for failure of enema reduction of intussusception in children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fluoroscopic criteria for on-site evaluation of failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- [The Effect of COVID-19 on Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center in South Korea with 10-Year Experience].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Article
- The impact of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of pediatric idiopathic intussusception.Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
- Long-Term Impact of a Low-Cost Paediatric Intussusception Air Enema Reduction Simulation-Based Education Programme in a Low-Middle Income Country.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Nationwide Population-Based Epidemiologic Study on Childhood Intussusception in South Korea: Emphasis on Treatment and Outcomes.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2020Article
- Ketamine sedation during air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Assessing safety and intraluminal pressure.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
- Effect of manipulative reduction combined with air enema on intestinal mucosal immune function in children with intussusception.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no consensus as to when surgical intervention should be considered for recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in a stable patient after previous successful air contrast enema.
objectiveTo review the patterns of ileocolic intussusceptions, air contrast enema success rates, and pathologic lead point rates in patients with and without recurrence to evaluate whether treatment outcomes depend on the number and timing between episodes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 683 children with air contrast enema performed for ileocolic intussusception between January 2000 and May 2018. Recurrent intussusceptions were separated into mutually exclusive categories: short-term only (≤7 days between episodes) and long-term (>7 days between episodes) intussusceptions. Long-term recurrences included both long-term only and long- and short-term intussusceptions.
resultsOf the 683 patients, 606 (89%) had at least 1 successful air contrast enema. Of the 606, 115 (19%) had recurrent intussusceptions after successful reduction. The air contrast enema success rate for a single intussusception was 86% (491/568) and for recurrent intussusceptions was 96% (110/115) (P=0.004). Single and recurrent intussusceptions had similar pathologic lead point rates (3.5% vs. 4.3%; P=0.593). Short-term and long-term recurrences did not differ in air contrast enema success rates (96% vs. 95%). Long-term recurrences had higher pathologic lead point rate compared to short-term only (13% vs. 0%; P=0.003). Of short-term recurrences, 99% (76/77) were ≤5 intussusceptions; 92% had successful air contrast enema without surgery.
conclusionThe majority of recurrent intussusceptions were successfully treated by air contrast enema. Short-term recurrences have lower pathologic lead point rates, suggesting that a higher surgical threshold may be plausible relative to long-term recurrences. In the appropriate clinical context, repeat air contrast enemas are a safe option for short-term recurrences, which can be attempted at least five times, potentially precluding the need for surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.