Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006059›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020

[Current aspects in pediatric urolithiasis treatment].

W L Strohmaier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W L StrohmaierRegiomed-Klinikum Coburg, Regiomed Medical School Coburg, Universität Split, Ketschendorfer Str. 33, 96450, Coburg, Deutschland. walter.strohmaier@klinikum-coburg.de.
Klinikum Coburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with adults, urolithiasis is quite rare in children (1-2% of all urinary stones occur during childhood). In principle, all therapy modalities for adults can also be used in children. However, due to some anatomic and functional peculiarities in children, the differential indication for the various treatment modalities differ. As a rule, asymptomatic renal stones are not treated but observed. More urinary stones pass spontaneously in children compared with adults. If spontaneous passage is not possible or does not occur, noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques are indicated. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the therapy of choice in most instances. Today, endoscopic techniques, however, can be safely used even in very small infants. For larger renal stones and those consisting of cysteine or whewellite, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the therapy of choice, and for distal ureteral stones ureteroscopy is the method of choice. Laparoscopic and open surgery are reserved for very rare cases, especially with concomitant pathologies. Bladder calculi are treated by transurethral or suprapubic lithotripsy.

Indexed as

LithotripsyNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousUreteroscopyChildHumansKidney CalculiUreteral CalculiUrolithiasisESWLPercutaneous nephrolithotomyUreteroscopyUrinary tract stonesUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID32006059
OpenAlexW3003577946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.