Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006022›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2020

Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Peter C Coyle, Subashan Perera, Valerie Shuman, Jessie VanSwearingen, Jennifer S Brach

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07586553 (Validity and Reliability of the Figure-of-8 Walk Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07586553 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Validity and Reliability of the Figure-of-8 Walk Test (8FWT) in Individuals With Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorBalikesir UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, Gait, BalanceArmsAssessment Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter C CoyleDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Subashan PereraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Valerie ShumanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jessie VanSwearingenDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer S BrachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN TRANSLATIONAL PATIENT-ORIENTED RESEARCH IN AGINGK24AG057728 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRACH, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2022
$658k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG057728NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.

methodsA secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.

resultsF8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%-59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%-56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%-50% lower.

conclusionsClinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMotor SkillsPsychometricsWalk TestCurved pathPerformancePsychometric propertiesReceiver operating characteristic curveWalking

Identifiers

PMID32006022
PMCPMC7662178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.