Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32006007›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2020

Amino Acid Digestibility of Extruded Chickpea and Yellow Pea Protein is High and Comparable in Moderately Stunted South Indian Children with Use of a Dual Stable Isotope Tracer Method.

Sarita Devi, Aneesia Varkey, Madan Dharmar, Roberta R Holt, Lindsay H Allen, M S Sheshshayee, Thomas Preston, Carl L Keen, Anura V Kurpad

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarita DeviDivision of Nutrition, St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Aneesia VarkeyDivision of Nutrition, St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Madan DharmarBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing and the Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Roberta R HoltDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Lindsay H AllenUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA, USA.
M S SheshshayeeDepartment of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Thomas PrestonScottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, UK.
Carl L KeenDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Anura V KurpadDepartment of Physiology, St. John's Medical College, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · INUniversity of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · USScottish Universities Environmental Research Centre · GBUC Davis Health · USUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/M/14/1/501681Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLegumes are an excellent plant source of the limiting indispensable amino acid (IAA) lysine in vegetarian, cereal-based diets. However, their digestibility is poor largely because of their antiprotease content. Extrusion can enhance digestibility by inactivating trypsin inhibitors and thus potentially improve the protein quality of legumes.

objectiveWe measured the digestibility of extruded chickpea and yellow pea protein with use of a dual stable isotope method in moderately stunted South Indian primary school children.

methodsTwenty-eight moderately stunted children (height-for-age z scores <-2.0 SD and >-3.0 SD) aged 6-11 y from low to middle socioeconomic status were randomly assigned to receive a test protein (extruded intrinsically [2H]-labeled chickpea or yellow pea) along with a standard of U-[13C]-spirulina protein to measure amino acid (AA) digestibility with use of a dual stable isotope method. Individual AA digestibility in the test protein was calculated by the ratios of AA enrichments in the test protein to the standard protein in the food and their appearance in blood plasma collected at 6 and 6.5 h during the experiment, representing a plateau state.

resultsThe mean AA digestibility of extruded chickpea and yellow pea protein in moderately stunted children (HAZ; -2.86 to -1.2) was high and similar in both extruded test proteins (89.0% and 88.0%, respectively, P = 0.83). However, lysine and proline digestibilities were higher in extruded chickpea than yellow pea (79.2% compared with 76.5% and 75.0% compared with 72.0%, respectively, P < 0.02).

conclusionExtruded chickpea and yellow pea protein had good IAA digestibility in moderately stunted children, which was 20% higher than an earlier report of their digestibility when pressure-cooked, measured by the same method in adults. Higher digestibility of lysine and proline highlights better retention of these AA in chickpea during extrusion-based processing. Extrusion might be useful for developing high-quality protein foods from legumes. This trial was registered at www.ctri.nic.in as CTRI/2018/03/012439.

Indexed as

DigestionAmino AcidsCarbon IsotopesChildCicerDeuteriumFemaleFood HandlingGrowth DisordersHumansIndiaLysineMalePisum sativumPlant ProteinsProlineAmino AcidsCarbon IsotopesDeuteriumLysinePlant ProteinsProlineTrypsin Inhibitorsdigestibilityextrusionlegumeproteinstable isotope

Identifiers

PMID32006007
PMCPMC7198288
OpenAlexW3004334742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.