Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005979›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2020

Enhancing cancer immunotherapy with nanomedicine.

Darrell J Irvine, Eric L Dane

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 331 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
331citing papers in PubMed
42.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

331 citing papers in PubMed, 822 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Programmed cell death in lung cancer: mechanisms, immune responses, and therapeutics.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

271 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darrell J IrvineDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. djirvine@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-1405
Eric L DaneDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-7264
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment via self-amplified RNA (SafeR) circuitsR01CA206218 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, RON · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Delivery of cytokines for cancer immunotherapy using nanolayer-controlled trafficking of liposomal nanoparticlesR01CA235375 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Paula T Hammond, Darrell J Irvine · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
Lymph node-targeted molecular vaccinesR01EB022433 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVINE, DARRELL J · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS R01 CA206218NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235375NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic targeting of the immune system in cancer is now a clinical reality and marked successes have been achieved, most notably through the use of checkpoint blockade antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. However, efforts to develop new immunotherapy agents or combination treatments to increase the proportion of patients who benefit have met with challenges of limited efficacy and/or significant toxicity. Nanomedicines - therapeutics composed of or formulated in carrier materials typically smaller than 100 nm - were originally developed to increase the uptake of chemotherapy agents by tumours and to reduce their off-target toxicity. Here, we discuss how nanomedicine-based treatment strategies are well suited to immunotherapy on the basis of nanomaterials' ability to direct immunomodulators to tumours and lymphoid organs, to alter the way biologics engage with target immune cells and to accumulate in myeloid cells in tumours and systemic compartments. We also discuss early efforts towards clinical translation of nanomedicine-based immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDrug Delivery SystemsHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymph NodesNanomedicineNanoparticlesNeoplasmsProtein EngineeringReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID32005979
PMCPMC7536618
OpenAlexW3003773438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.