Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005969›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2020

Regulatory R-loops as facilitators of gene expression and genome stability.

Christof Niehrs, Brian Luke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 342 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
342citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

342 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 530 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. NAT10-dependent NCell reports · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

282 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christof NiehrsInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Brian LukeInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany. b.luke@imb-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-5511
German Cancer Research Center · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

European Research Council 786834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

R-loops are three-stranded structures that harbour an RNA-DNA hybrid and frequently form during transcription. R-loop misregulation is associated with DNA damage, transcription elongation defects, hyper-recombination and genome instability. In contrast to such 'unscheduled' R-loops, evidence is mounting that cells harness the presence of RNA-DNA hybrids in scheduled, 'regulatory' R-loops to promote DNA transactions, including transcription termination and other steps of gene regulation, telomere stability and DNA repair. R-loops formed by cellular RNAs can regulate histone post-translational modification and may be recognized by dedicated reader proteins. The two-faced nature of R-loops implies that their formation, location and timely removal must be tightly regulated. In this Perspective, we discuss the cellular processes that regulatory R-loops modulate, the regulation of R-loops and the potential differences that may exist between regulatory R-loops and unscheduled R-loops.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGene Expression RegulationGenomic InstabilityHistone CodeHumansNucleic Acid ConformationR-Loop StructuresRNATelomereTranscription, GeneticDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID32005969
PMCPMC7116639
OpenAlexW3004029085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.