Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005945›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2020

Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Louis Buscail, Barbara Bournet, Pierre Cordelier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 415 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
415citing papers in PubMed
39.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

415 citing papers in PubMed, 718 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel KRAS-G12D inhibitors.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting ferroptosis to overcome drug resistance in gastrointestinal cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

355 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis BuscailDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Toulouse III, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France. buscail.l@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1003
Barbara BournetDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Toulouse III, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Pierre CordelierINSERM UMR 1037, Toulouse Centre for Cancer Research, University of Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is predicted to be the second most common cause of death within the next 10 years. The prognosis for this disease is poor despite diagnostic progress and new chemotherapeutic regimens. The oncogenic KRAS mutation is the major event in pancreatic cancer; it confers permanent activation of the KRAS protein, which acts as a molecular switch to activate various intracellular signalling pathways and transcription factors inducing cell proliferation, migration, transformation and survival. Several laboratory methods have been developed to detect KRAS mutations in biological samples, including digital droplet PCR (which displays high sensitivity). Clinical studies have revealed that a KRAS mutation assay in fine-needle aspiration material combined with cytopathology increases the sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value of cytopathology for a positive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In addition, the presence of KRAS mutations in serum and plasma (liquid biopsies) correlates with a worse prognosis. The presence of mutated KRAS can also have therapeutic implications, whether at the gene level per se, during its post-translational maturation, interaction with nucleotides and after activation of the various oncogenic signals. Further pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies on new molecules are required, especially small synthetic molecules, before they can be used in the therapeutic arsenal for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDisease Models, AnimalHumansMice, TransgenicMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Signal TransductionBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID32005945
OpenAlexW3003574401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.