Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005926›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A dog oviduct-on-a-chip model of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma.

Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz, Jennifer Beth Nagashima, Bastien Venzac, Séverine Le Gac, Nucharin Songsasen

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advancing bovineFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Bioengineering Approaches to Improve Gynecological Cancer Outcomes.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo FerrazCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, Virginia, 22630, USA. ferrazm@si.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-3459
Jennifer Beth NagashimaCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, Virginia, 22630, USA.
Bastien VenzacApplied Microfluidics for Bioengineering Research, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and TechMed Center, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Séverine Le GacApplied Microfluidics for Bioengineering Research, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and TechMed Center, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Nucharin SongsasenCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, Virginia, 22630, USA.
Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

An ovary-on-a-chip for understanding early folliculogenesis and reproductive toxicology in a large mammalian modelF32HD090854 · NICHD · SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION · PI NAGASHIMA, JENNIFER · 2017 to 2020
$231k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD090854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related mortality in women, with an expected 5-year survival rate of only 47%. High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), an epithelial cancer phenotype, is the most common malignant ovarian cancer. It is known that the precursors of HGSC originate from secretory epithelial cells within the Fallopian tube, which first develops as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). Here, we used gene editing by CRISPR-Cas9 to knock out the oncogene p53 in dog oviductal epithelia cultured in a dynamic microfluidic chip to create an in vitro model that recapitulated human STIC. Similar to human STIC, the gene-edited oviduct-on-a-chip, exhibited loss of cell polarization and had reduced ciliation, increased cell atypia and proliferation, with multilayered epithelium, increased Ki67, PAX8 and Myc and decreased PTEN and RB1 mRNA expression. This study provides a biomimetic in vitro model to study STIC progression and to identify potential biomarkers for early detection of HGSC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma in SituCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene EditingLab-On-A-Chip DevicesOvarian NeoplasmsOviductsPolymerase Chain ReactionCRISPR-Associated Protein 9

Identifiers

PMID32005926
PMCPMC6994655
OpenAlexW3004240662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.