Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005839›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure by reducing mechanical irritation.

Toshiaki Takahashi, Ryoko Murayama, Mari Abe-Doi, Maki Miyahara-Kaneko, Chiho Kanno, Miwa Nakamura, Mariko Mizuno, Chieko Komiyama, Hiromi Sanada

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toshiaki TakahashiDepartment of Life Support Technology (Molten), Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-4784
Ryoko MurayamaDepartment of Advanced Nursing Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mari Abe-DoiDepartment of Advanced Nursing Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Maki Miyahara-KanekoDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiho KannoDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Miwa NakamuraDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko MizunoDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Chieko KomiyamaDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi SanadaGlobal Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. hsanada-tky@umin.ac.jp.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral intravenous catheter failure is a significant concern in the clinical setting. We investigated the effectiveness of care protocols, including an ultrasonographic "pre-scan" for selecting a large-diameter vein before catheterization, a "post-scan" for confirming the catheter tip position after catheterization with ultrasonography, and the use of a flexible polyurethane catheter to reduce the mechanical irritation that contributes to the incidence of catheter failure. This intervention study was a non-randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the abovementioned care protocols, the effects of which were compared to the outcomes in the control group, which received conventional care. For both groups, participants were selected from patients in two wards at the University of Tokyo in Japan between July and November 2017. Inverse probability score-based weighted methods (IPW) using propensity score were used to estimate the effectiveness of care protocols. The primary outcome was catheter failure, which was defined as accidental and unplanned catheter removal. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare rates of time until catheter failure. We analysed 189 and 233 catheters in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the control group, 68 catheters (29.2%) were determined to have failed, whereas, in the intervention group, only 21 catheters (11.1%) failed. There was a significant difference between each group regarding the ratio of catheter failure adjusted according to IPW (p = 0.003). The relative risk reduction of the intervention for catheter failure was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.47-0.71). Care protocols, including assessment of vein diameter, vein depth, and catheter tip location using ultrasound examination for reducing mechanical irritation is a promising method to reduce catheter failure incidence.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsDevice RemovalEquipment FailureFemaleHumansMaleMechanical PhenomenaMiddle AgedPreoperative CareSurvival AnalysisUltrasonographyVeins

Identifiers

PMID32005839
PMCPMC6994694
OpenAlexW3004228967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.