Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005835›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Surface protein imputation from single cell transcriptomes by deep neural networks.

Zilu Zhou, Chengzhong Ye, Jingshu Wang, Nancy R Zhang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DOGMA-seq and multimodal, single-cell analysis in acute myeloid leukemia.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zilu ZhouGraduate Group in Genomics and Computational Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chengzhong YeSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-1078
Jingshu WangDepartment of Statistics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nancy R ZhangDepartment of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. nzh@wharton.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0880-5749

Funding

Data Analysis UnitU2CCA233285 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI TAN, KAI · 2018 to 2023
$13.2M
Statistical Models for Genome Sequencing and AssociationR01HG006137 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JI, HANLEE P, ZHANG, NANCY R · 2011 to 2022
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Single-Cell TranscriptomicsR01GM125301 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, ZHANG, NANCY R · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233285NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is invaluable for studying cell populations, cell-surface proteins are often integral markers of cellular function and serve as primary targets for therapeutic intervention. Here we propose a transfer learning framework, single cell Transcriptome to Protein prediction with deep neural network (cTP-net), to impute surface protein abundances from scRNA-seq data by learning from existing single-cell multi-omic resources.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCellsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMembrane ProteinsNeural Networks, ComputerSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32005835
PMCPMC6994606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.