ArticleNature communications2020
Spatial quantification of dynamic inter and intra particle crystallographic heterogeneities within lithium ion electrodes.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupling the effects of surface morphology and interfacial chemistry on localized electrochemical kinetics in LiCoOChemical science · 2026Article
- Chemical heterogeneity for battery materials.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026Review
- Uncovering battery electrochemical mechanisms by artificial intelligence.National science review · 2025Review
- Characterization and calibration of DECTRIS PILATUS3 X CdTe 2M high-Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
- AI-enhanced X-ray diffraction analysis: towards real-time mineral phase identification and quantification.IUCrJ · 2024Article
- Replica exchange molecular dynamics for Li-intercalation in graphite: a new solution for an old problem.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Asynchronous domain dynamics and equilibration in layered oxide battery cathode.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Multiscale Imaging Techniques for Real-Time, Noninvasive Diagnosis of Li-Ion Battery Failures.Small science · 2023Article
- Defects and nanostrain gradients control phase transition mechanisms in single crystal high-voltage lithium spinel.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Recent developments in X-ray diffraction/scattering computed tomography for materials science.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023Review
- Dynamic In-Plane Heterogeneous and Inverted Response of Graphite to Fast Charging and Discharging Conditions in Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells.Small science · 2023Article
- Twin boundary defect engineering improves lithium-ion diffusion for fast-charging spinel cathode materials.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Depth-dependent valence stratification driven by oxygen redox in lithium-rich layered oxide.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Fast operando X-ray pair distribution function using the DRIX electrochemical cell.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2020Article
- Machine-learning-revealed statistics of the particle-carbon/binder detachment in lithium-ion battery cathodes.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of lithium ion electrodes is hindered by unfavorable chemical heterogeneities that pre-exist or develop during operation. Time-resolved spatial descriptions are needed to understand the link between such heterogeneities and a cell's performance. Here, operando high-resolution X-ray diffraction-computed tomography is used to spatially and temporally quantify crystallographic heterogeneities within and between particles throughout both fresh and degraded Li
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.